Dugesia sicula Lepori, 1948
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4532.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:807B317B-D883-439F-97B9-B0C0F09D9666 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5988956 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C45EE309-B11A-FFF7-66FB-FE6011F2FA39 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dugesia sicula Lepori, 1948 |
status |
|
Dugesia sicula Lepori, 1948 View in CoL
Dugesia sicula was first reported for Sardinia on the basis of fissiparous populations, in which a certain percentage of individuals underwent a sexualization process, from 12 Sardinian localities, including 2 small nearby islets (spring and wells on the Tavolara Island Protected Area and watercourses on the S. Antioco Island) (Pala et al., 1995) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). After several years other fissiparous populations were found in two other watercourses, one in the northwestern Asinara Island National Park (Rio d’Auteri reservoir) ( Stocchino, 2003) and another in southeastern Sardinia (Fiume Quirra) (M. Pala, pers. comm.) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). All Sardinian populations showed a coastal distribution with a high degree of tolerance to variations in environmental factors, especially temperature and watercourses hydrological regime e.g. temporary water (Pala et al., 1995; G.A. Stocchino, pers. obs.).
Dugesia sicula View in CoL has a pan-Mediterranean geographic range where it is mostly represented by fissiparous populations with only a few sexual populations being present in Mallorca, Algeria, Tunisia and Israel. Two mixed populations, including both sexual and fissiparous individuals, were reported from Sicily (Stocchino & Manconi 2013 and references therein). A recent reassessment of the taxonomic status of D. biblica Benazzi & Banchetti, 1973 View in CoL from Israel and Turkey, based on morphological and molecular studies, considered this species to be a junior synonym of D. sicula ( Solà et al., 2015) View in CoL .
As for karyology, numerous studies confirmed a diploid condition for sexual populations with a chromosome complement of 2n = 18; n = 9, and a triploid condition for fissiparous populations with a chromosome complement of 3n = 27; n = 9 + 1-5 B-chromosomes (see Stocchino et al., 2012 and references therein).
Among Dugesia species, the haploid complement of nine chromosomes of D. sicula is shared with only five other species: D. maghrebiana Stocchino et al., 2009 , from North Africa; D. arabica Harrath & Sluys, 2013 from Yemen; D. aethiopica Stocchino et al., 2002 and D. afromontana Stocchino & Sluys, 2012 from the Afrotropical region; D. bifida Stocchino & Sluys, 2014 from Madagascar ( Stocchino et al., 2002, 2004, 2009, 2012, 2014; Harrath et al., 2013).
Although D. sicula is extremely widespread, a molecular analyses on many fissiparous populations from its entire distributional range revealed a remarkable pattern of low interpopulation genetic variability, which was interpreted as the result of recent anthropochore colonizations after triploidization of sexual diploid populations ( Lazaro et al., 2009).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dugesia sicula Lepori, 1948
Stocchino, Giacinta Angela 2018 |
D. biblica
Benazzi & Banchetti 1973 |
Dugesia sicula
Lepori 1948 |