Dugesia liguriensis De Vries, 1988
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4532.4.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:807B317B-D883-439F-97B9-B0C0F09D9666 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5988958 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C45EE309-B11A-FFF6-66FB-F9B410A3FF23 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dugesia liguriensis De Vries, 1988 |
status |
|
Dugesia liguriensis De Vries, 1988 View in CoL
A peculiar case concerns a previously presumed fissiparous population of D. benazzii from the Rio Mannu di Cagliari in southern Sardinia ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Individuals have a triploid karyotype with 24 chromosomes and never sexualized under long-term laboratory conditions (M. Pala and G.A. Stocchino pers. obs.). Surprisingly, a recent molecular analysis assigned this population to D. liguriensis , together with two other asexual triploid (3n = 24; n = 8) populations from northeastern Spain and Liguria ( Lazaro et al., 2009), a species firstly reported from Liguria and later also from Piedmont (northern Italy) (cf. Stocchino et al., 2013a). The sexual population from Piedmont has a diploid chromosome complement of 2n = 16; n = 8 (cf. Lazaro et al., 2009). Therefore, the species is presumably characterized by both sexual diploid as well as asexual triploid populations.
In view of the present disjunct distribution of D. liguriensis , the single population from Sardinia could be considered as the sole representative on the island of a population complex that formerly had a much wider distribution, involving the Proto-Ligurian microplate, before the Corsica-Sardinia block broke up during the late Oligocene and Miocene. Experiments under lab conditions to stimulate sexualization of the Sardinian specimens are in progress with the aim to resolve the taxonomic status of this Sardinian population also at the morphological level.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |