Phytoecia ( s.str. ) shokhini Kasatkin, 2010
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.30.3.07 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C45287EA-8C2B-B309-FF40-F55C2966FCF6 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Phytoecia ( s.str. ) shokhini Kasatkin, 2010 |
| status |
|
Phytoecia ( s.str.) shokhini Kasatkin, 2010 View in CoL
Figs 20 View Figs 17–22 , 30, 38. A View Figs 27–39 position of this species in the system of genus Phytoecia Dejean, 1835 is repeatedly discussed. It was described in Phytoecia s.str. [ Kasatkin, 2010], on base of the structure of the apical phallomere ( Fig. 20 View Figs 17–22 ). Danilevsky [2019; 2020a]
transferred Ph. shokhini View in CoL to the subgenus Neomusaria Plavilstshikov, 1928 without any serious reasons. In the same time, he included the very similar (according the original description) Ph. napolovi Danilevsky, 2011 View in CoL in the nominatypical subgenus. The taxonomic structure of the nominatypical subgenus is also not clear (as seen on Figs 17–22 View Figs 17–22 ) and needs revision. It is the subject of our following work. The endophallic structure has already established itself as a reliable character for the separation of subgenera Phytoecia View in CoL [ Kasatkin, 2015, 2018]. The characters of this structure, which were examined by us in 5 species of Neomusaria ( Figs 23–26 View Figs 23–26 ), the shape of tegmen and lateral lobes ( Figs 37–39 View Figs 27–39 ) and the shape of claws ( Figs 32–36 View Figs 27–39 ) clearly indicates that Ph. shokhini View in CoL belongs to Phytoecia View in CoL s.str. Also, it is known that all Neomusaria species associated with Lamiaceae View in CoL plants ( Salvia View in CoL ), while Ph. shokhini View in CoL feeding on Apiaceae View in CoL .
Acknowledgments. The author is grateful to † Dr O. Merkl ( HNHM, Budapest, Hungary), Dr A. Solodovnikov ( MNHD, Copenhagen, Denmark) and Dr H. Schilhammer ( NMW, Wien, Austria), Mr A. Zubov (Moscow, Russia) for the provided material, Dr M. Ranjbar ( College of Science Bu- Ali Sina University , Hamadân, Iran) for identification of host plants, Dr H. Schillhammer ( NMW, Wien, Austria) for prepared photos of holotype. Dr D. Azar (Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon) is acknowledged for his help in the organizing of expedition in Lebanon and translation of Arabic text .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Phytoecia ( s.str. ) shokhini Kasatkin, 2010
| Kasatkin, D. G. 2021 |
Ph. napolovi
| Danilevsky 2011 |
Ph. shokhini
| Kasatkin 2010 |
Ph. shokhini
| Kasatkin 2010 |
Ph. shokhini
| Kasatkin 2010 |
Ph. ( s.str. ) shokhini
| Kasatkin 2010 |
Ph. ( s.str. ) shokhini
| Kasatkin 2010 |
Ph. ( N. ) longicornis
| Pesarini et Sabbadini 2009 |
Ph. ( N. ) longicornis
| Pesarini et Sabbadini 2009 |
Ph. ( N. ) waltli
| Sama 1991 |
Ph. ( N. ) waltli
| Sama 1991 |
Neomusaria
| Plavilstshikov 1928 |
Neomusaria
| Plavilstshikov 1928 |
Neomusaria
| Plavilstshikov 1928 |
Ph. ( N. ) bodemeyeri
| Reitter 1913 |
Ph. ( N. ) bodemeyeri
| Reitter 1913 |
Ph. ( N. ) suvorowi
| Pic 1905 |
Ph. ( N. ) suvorowi
| Pic 1905 |
Ph. ( Neomusaria ) merkli
| Ganglbauer 1884 |
Ph. ( Neomusaria ) merkli
| Ganglbauer 1884 |
Phytoecia
| Dejean 1835 |
Phytoecia
| Dejean 1835 |
Phytoecia
| Dejean 1835: 27 |
Phytoecia
| Dejean 1835: 27 |
