Amblyomma paulopunctatum Neumann, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4871.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C21A719F-9A6B-4227-8386-1AFA22620614 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4583178 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C04787D4-FF99-FFB3-FF07-F8F1605BC8E2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amblyomma paulopunctatum Neumann, 1899 |
status |
|
95. Amblyomma paulopunctatum Neumann, 1899 View in CoL .
An Afrotropical species whose adults and nymphs are usually found on Artiodactyla : Suidae , but all parasitic stages, including the undescribed larva, have been collected from these hosts. Adults and nymphs have also been recovered from Bovidae ; adult ticks alone have been collected from Artiodactyla : Hippopotamidae , Carnivora : Hyaenidae , and Rodentia : Thryonomyidae ; larvae and nymphs have been found on Galliformes : Phasianidae . Amblyomma paulopunctatum is a very rare parasite of humans.
F: Robinson (1926), but see note below
N: Borght-Elbl (1977), but see note below
L: undescribed
Redescriptions
M: Robinson (1926), Tendeiro (1952), Theiler and Salisbury (1959), Elbl and Anastos (1966a), Keirans (1985a), Matthysse and Colbo (1987), Voltzit and Keirans (2003); see note below
F: Tendeiro (1952), Elbl and Anastos (1966a), Keirans (1985a), Matthysse and Colbo (1987), Voltzit and Keirans (2003); see note below
N: none
Note: Robinson (1926) and Keirans (1985a) stated that the first description of the female of Amblyomma paulopunctatum is in Neumann (1908d) under the name Amblyomma trimaculatum . This opinion is disputed in Guglielmone et al. (2003) and Guglielmone and Nava (2014), who treat both names as incertae sedis, because they note that females of Amblyomma guianense , described in Neumann (1907d) , and Amblyomma trimaculatum are almost identical. Neumann (1908d) recognized that both species are morphologically close, and the name Amblyomma trimaculatum was subsequently ignored in Neumann (1911a) . Therefore, the first description of the female of Amblyomma paulopunctatum is considered to be that in Robinson (1926). The description of the nymph of Amblyomma paulopunctatum in Borght-Elbl (1977) is tentatively recognized in Keirans (1985a), but the nymph is considered undescribed in Voltzit and Keirans (2003). The description of the nymph of Amblyomma paulopunctatum in Borght-Elbl (1977) is here treated as provisionally valid. Tendeiro (1952) illustrated the male and female of Amblyomma paulopunctatum as lacking spurs on coxae II and III, but other authors depict both sexes with a short spur on each coxa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.