Megaselia Rondani, 1856
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.054.0204 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC7D87CE-E66C-FFE5-06A1-F9FBFCD95729 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Megaselia Rondani, 1856 |
status |
|
Genus Megaselia Rondani, 1856 View in CoL View at ENA
All but one specimen belong to the genus Megaselia . The recognition of the species in this huge genus is based on the male hypopygium in the first instance. Beyer has described many Afrotropical species culminating in a monograph ( Beyer 1965). However , he either fails to illustrate the hypopygia or his figures are sketchy and often misleading. Indeed it has been generally judged to be difficult to use Beyer’s keys with confidence. This is partly due to runs of couplets being based on male features only interspersed with couplets based on female characters only. Furthermore , Beyer described some species from females only, including cases where he described the male as a separate species. In addition his keys are notable for errors and omissions, such as the species from the Seychelles described by Collin, apart from there being many subsequently described species .
Both sexes of the four new species run to M. ahmedseifi Disney, 2009 in the keys to Arabian species (Disney 2009 b). With it these five species form a distinct species group.A key to all five species is given below. Otherwise the way the species run down in Beyer’s (1965) keys are indicated for each of the new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |