Syllepte Hübner, 1823

Becker, Vitor Osmar, 2023, The identity of Syllepte incomptalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae) with synonymies, new combinations and new species, Revista Brasileira de Entomologia (e 20220093) 67 (1), pp. 1-12 : 2-8

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2022-0093

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8124010

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC1DC803-FFFC-FFF0-FFF1-F917C9A6FF12

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Syllepte Hübner, 1823
status

 

Syllepte Hübner, 1823 View in CoL View at ENA

Syllepte Hübner, 1823 View in CoL : Zuträge Samml. exot. Schmett., 2: 18.

TS: Syllepte incomptalis Hübner, 1823 View in CoL ,Zuträge Samml. exot.Schmett., 2: 18, pl. [50], figs 285, 286, by monotypy.

=Sylepta Hübner, [1825]: Verz. bekannter Schmett.: 336, misspelling (misspl).

=Syllepta Hübner,[1826]: Verz.bekannter Schmett.(Anz.):58, misspl.

= Pantographa Lederer, 1863 View in CoL , Wien ent. Monatschr. 7: 270. Syn. n.

Type-species (TS): Pionea scripturalis Guenée, 1854, Hist. nat. Insectes, 8: 373, by monotypy.

=Pantographis Lederer, 1863, Wien ent. Monatschr. 7: 270, incorrect original spelling.

= Micromartinia Amsel, 1957 View in CoL ,Ent. Venez. 10 (3-4): [2], replacement name. Syn. n.

=Martinia Amsel, 1956, Bol. Ent. Venez. 10 (3): 198. Preoccupied. (M’Coy, 1844 [Brachiopoda]). Syn. n.

TS: Botys mnemusalis Walker, 1859,List Specimens of lepid.insects in the Colln Br. Mus. 18: 593, by original designation.

Diagnosis: Medium to large ( Figs. 1-2 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 a-m): FW length 14-20 mm (32-45 mm wingspan). Labial palpi short, curved up to mid frons. Antenna short ciliated in males, filiform in females.Forewing (FW) apex angled or falcate, pale yellow, area distad of median line to termen, from dorsum to M 1, often fuscous; orbicular and reniform spots well marked; a dotted line distad of the postmedial band, half the way between this and termen. Hind wing (HW) often dusted with fuscous scales; orbicular spot present, often followed distad by a conspicuous whitish reniform dot; four dotted, partially interrupted, nearly parallel lines from near base to before termen.

Male genitalia ( Figs. 3-4 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 ): Uncus short, wide, apex round ( Figs.3 View Figure 3 a-h) or indented ( Figs.3 View Figure 3 i-m). Valva broad, tapering towards round apex, costa straight, ventral margin evenly round, sacculus ill-defined, fibula small, thin, sharp pointed, or a flat, small, subrectangular plate. Vinculum round, small, expanded basad as thin or long spine at middle. Phallus long, thin, nearly straight; vesica with or without long, sclerotized plate.

Female genitalia ( Figs. 5 View Figure 5 l-q): Ostium bursae long, except for S. sororalis , narrow; ductus bursae long, almost as long as abdomen, straight, broadened slightly basad; corpus bursae oblong, signum a small, round, spiny plate.

Host plants: Known only for two species of the genus, all plants belong in the Malvaceae . Syllepte limata, popularly known in the USA as the Basswood (Tilia americana) leafroller moth was also reared on Ochroma pyramidale in Puerto Rico (Martorell, [1976]: 182). Syllepte confusalis was reared by the author from leafroller caterpillars feeding on Callianthe rufinervia (A.ST.-Hil.) in Brazil.

Distribution: New World, from Quebec, along eastern North America, to the Caribbean (S. limata), and all of them from Mexico to southern Brazil, where at least some of them are present. In VOB there is a series of 12 specimens of S. incomptalis ( Fig. 1d View Figure 1 ) collected at the dry, semi-desertic areas of Mexico (Sonora, Colima, Puebla, Chiapas), and in the USNM a few from Mexico, and one from Costa Rica (as P. idmonalis Druce ).

Remarks: The original figures in Hübner (1823: pl. [50], figs 285, 286), reproduced here ( Figs. 1 View Figure 1 a-b), are rather crude, as expected to be found in publications from the time. However, the patterns of both the dorsal and ventral sides, are sufficient to allow recognition. There are several species in the New World tropics that resemble S. incomptalis . However, as clearly shown in the original illustrations, S. incomptalis FW has a dotted line distad of the postmedial band, halfway between this and termen, and the HW presents four dotted lines, a unique combination of characters only present in this species. All the other species either do not have such a line, or this line is replaced by a broad, gray band along termen, and the HW usually has two lines -three in a few cases- but never four. As old specimens of pyraloids have been found in the NHMW, Vienna, that possibly includes Hübner material ( Munroe, 1958: 298), it seems appropriate that a neotype should not be designated, as some relevant type specimen(s) might still turn up.

Munroe (1995: 59) listed nine species in Pantographa , including P. idmonalis Druce , syn. n., a junior synonym of S. incomptalis and Sylepta [sic] S. prorogata Hampson, 1912 , syn. n. ( Fig. 2o View Figure 2 ), a junior synonym of Haritalodes pharaxalis ( Druce, 1895), comb. n. It is very likely that his decision was based on the characters of genitalia. To confirm this, the genitalia of all species ( Figs. 3-4 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 ) were examined. As S. mnemusalis (Walker) ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 q-r), the type species of Micromartinia Amsel , syn. n., resembles S. gorgonalis ( Druce, 1895) ( Fig. 1n View Figure 1 ), specimens of these were also dissected and the genitalia ( Figs. 3 View Figure 3 q-r) confirm their close relationship, making Micromartinia another junior synonym. The genitalia of some of the species listed by Munroe under Syllepte with a pattern that resembles that of species formerly listed under Pantographa , were also dissected, but none seems to be congeneric with S. incomptalis . Two specimens that look very similar to specimens of S. incomptalis , collected together with specimens of this species, are also described here as a new species, to avoid future confusion. Some of the species listed by Munroe under Syllepte as mispl.[aced] were also dissected and found not congeneric with S. incomptalis , i.e.: S. aechmisalis (Walker) ( Figs. 2q View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 s-t) [see Haritalodes remarks], S. amando (Cramer, 1779) ( Figs. 2l View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 g-h), S. angulifera ( Druce, 1895) ( Figs. 2i View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 m-n), S. coelivitta (Walker, [1886]) ( Figs. 2k View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 o-p), S. dialis Schaus, 1912 , [= S. strigicincta Hampson, 1912 , syn. n.] ( Figs.2 View Figure 2 c-f, 4e-f), S. laticalis ( Lederer, 1863) ( Figs. 2g View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 i-j), S. pactolalis ( Guenée, 1854) ( Figs. 2m View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 q-r), and S. striginervalis ( Guenée, 1854) ( Figs. 2h View Figure 2 , 4 View Figure 4 m-n).

Considering that the main purpose of this work is to establish the identity of S. incomptalis , not a revision of the genus, the resulting new combinations and synonymies are only summarized below (see

Nomenclatural summary), and illustrations of the adults and genitalia are presented to allow their identification.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Crambidae

SubFamily

Spilomelinae

Loc

Syllepte Hübner, 1823

Becker, Vitor Osmar 2023
2023
Loc

Micromartinia

Amsel 1957
1957
Loc

Pantographa

Lederer 1863
1863
Loc

Syllepte Hübner, 1823

Hubner 1823
1823
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF