Goeldia gauderio, Almeida-Silva & Brescovit, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E438D8DA-B142-4A0C-BA25-F6B6EC45C197 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10850408 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B86D8799-FF93-FFF7-8CDD-FD0AFB3471E1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Goeldia gauderio |
status |
sp. nov. |
Goeldia gauderio sp. nov.
( Figs 11 View FIGURE 11 ; 27 View FIGURE 27 )
Type material. Holotype ♂ from Porto Alegre (30°01’58”S 51°13’48”W), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 11.VII.1963, C. Hartlieb & Moraes coll., deposited at MCN 1413 GoogleMaps ; Paratypes: 1♀, Porto Alegre (30°01’58”S 51°13’48”W), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 31.VII.1963, C. Hartlieb & Moraes coll. ( MCN 1002 ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, 2♂, 4 juv. from San Luis (33°18’S 66°20’W), 200 Km W of Santa Rosa, GoogleMaps San Luis, Argentina, XI.1982, A. Roig coll. ( MACN 16211 View Materials ; IBSP 165960 View Materials ) GoogleMaps ; 1♀ from Papagayos (32°46’1.2”S 65°22’58.8”W), San Luis, Argentina, 9.IX.1981, E. Maury coll. ( IBSP 165961 View Materials ) GoogleMaps .
Additional Material Examined. None.
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition derived from a regional slang used in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, south of Brazil, generally referring to nomads or vagabond, countryside dwellers.
Diagnosis. Males of Goeldia gauderio resemble those of G. luteipes in the dark coloration of the cephalic area and femora. They differ by the position of the spermatic duct median fold at 12 o’clock ( Fig. 11B View FIGURE 11 ), by the thinner patellar apophysis, pointing posteriorly ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ) and by the short and rectangular tegular process ( Fig. 11A View FIGURE 11 ) in G. gauderio ’s male palp. The female epigynum can be recognized by the fusion of the rim with the copulatory duct wall ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ).
Description. Male (Holotype): Coloration: cephalic area and chelicerae reddish brown, thoracic area, endite, labium and sternum brown. Legs with femora completely or almost completely black. Opisthosoma black. Total length 5.15. Carapace: lenght 2.50; width 0.95; height 1.00. Opisthosoma: length 2.6; width 1.7. Clypeus: height 0.15. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.07; ALE 0.11; PME 0.09; PLE 0.09; AME–AME 0.1; AME–ALE 0.11; PME–PME 0.14; PME–PLE 0.23; AME–PME 0.13; ALE–PLE 0.09. Chelicerae paturon: length 1.25. Leg measurements: I: femur 1.88/ patella 0.75/ tibia 1.5/ metatarsus 1.38/ tarsus 0.93/ total 6.43; II: 1.625/0.7/ 1.25/ 1.38/ 0.70/ 5.65; III: 1.45/ 0.7/ 1.25/ 1.15/ 0.68/ 5.23; IV: 1.98/ 1.73/ 0.78/ 1.53/ 0.78/ 6.78. Leg formula 4123. Leg spination femur I–II p1ap; tibia I v1p-2-1r-2, p1-1-1-1, r1ap; II v0-1m-2, r0-1-0-1ap, p0-0-1-1ap; III v1-2; p0-1-0- 1, r1ap; IV v1-0-0-1-2-0, r1ap; metatarsus I v2-1p-1p-1r-1p- 1m, p0-1-0-1ap, r1ap; II v1-2- 1m, r0-1-0-1ap, p1ap; III v2-2- 1m, p1-1-1, r1ap; IV v2-2-2- 1m, p1ap, r1ap. Retrolateral basal side of the tibia and retrolateral apical side of the patella with a knob ( Fig. 11B, D View FIGURE 11 ). Patellar apophysis with a thin depression ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ). MLT apex partially sclerotized and long ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11 ). Tegular process as depicted ( Fig. 11A View FIGURE 11 ). Pars pendula thickening subdistal ( Fig. 11D View FIGURE 11 ).
Female (Paratype, MCN 1002): Coloration: carapace brown with cephalic area and chelicerae slightly darker. Endites, labium and sternum brown. Legs brown with femora slightly darker. Opisthosoma brown. Total length 8.00. Carapace: length 3.28; width 2.9; height 1.6. Opisthosoma 4.08 long; 3.2 wide. Clypeus: height 0.29. Chilum absent. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.1; ALE 0.12; PME 0.1; PLE 0.12; AME–AME 0.13; AME–ALE 0.21; PME–PME 0.22; PME–PLE 0.4; AME–PME 0.17; ALE–PLE 0.15. Chelicerae paturon: length 1.81. Leg measurements: I: femur 2.15/ patella 1.10/ tibia 1.75/ metatarsus 1.69/ tarsus 0.91/ total 7.59; II: 1.6/ 0.97/ 1.47/ 1.56/ 0.81/ 6.41; III: 1.60/ 0.72/ 1.16/ 1.28/ 0.6/ 5.36; IV: 2.25/1.88/1.00/1.56/ 0.68/ 7.37. Leg formula 1423. Leg spination: femur I–II p1ap; tibia III p0-1-1, r1ap; IV v1sap, p 1ap, r1ap; metatarsus I v2-1p-2- 1m, p1ap, r0-1-1; II v2-2- 1m, p1ap, r1ap; v2-1p-2- 1m, p1ap, r1ap, d1p-1p-2ap; III v2-1p-2- 1m, p1ap, r1ap, d1p-1p-2ap; IV v2-1p-1p- 1m, p1ap, r1ap, d2ap; tarsus III v 1m; IV v2ap. Copulatory duct wall fused to the epigynal rim ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ). Posterior lateral edge of the epigynum rounded and sinuous ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ). Copulatory ducts apex dorsally curved ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ). Extra lobe of the spermathecae L-shaped ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ). Vertical spermathecae bent horizontally ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ). Horizontal spermathecae very short and almost round ( Fig. 11F View FIGURE 11 ).
Variation. Length (3♂): total 5.05–5.30; carapace 2.50–2.80; femur I 1.65–1.88. (2♀): total 5.40–6.60; carapace 2.10–2.70; femur I 1.56–1.82.
Distribution. State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and Province of San Luis, Argentina ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |