Meganola odontographa Hacker, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D310B8C8-A16F-4B55-B6E6-8FD5EC35DE63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4410657 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B804878C-FFCF-A400-FF69-3CCD2B20F9B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meganola odontographa Hacker, 2012 |
status |
|
Meganola odontographa Hacker, 2012
Meganola odontographa Hacker, 2012 , Esperiana 17: 427. Type locality: [ Burkina Faso] Comoe. Holotype, ♀ (ZSM).
Remark. The species is known exclusively from female specimens. However, having compared the illustrations of M. odontographa and M. allardi in Hacker et al. (2012: 328 , 427), it seems to be highly likely that the two species are conspecific. As the author of the present paper could not locate specimens of either species for thorough examination, both taxa have tentatively been treated here as valid. It is also worth mentioning that M. inculta Hacker, 2012 described from Katanga Province, D.R. Congo and M. griseodentata Hacker, 2012 described from near Iringa, Tanzania are also confusingly similar to M. allardi both externally and in genital morphology. The female of M. inculta illustrated in Hacker et al. (2012: 332) is misidentified and is in fact M. monofascia (van Son, 1933) . In order to prove whether or not the four species are conspecific, examination of further material is necessary.
Distribution. Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast and Nigeria ( Hacker et al. 2012).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Meganola odontographa Hacker, 2012
László, Gyula M. 2020 |
Meganola odontographa
Hacker 2012 |