Chaco castanea, Oca, Laura Montes de & Perez-Miles, Fernando, 2013
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.337.5779 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B763E421-8909-668C-5970-13E0E8B9E58C |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Chaco castanea |
status |
sp. n. |
Chaco castanea sp. n. Figs 1 A–D, 3 A–E
Types.
Male holotype (deposited in FCE-MY 0767) from, Rocha, Perla de Rocha, 34°25.0'S, 53°51.0'W, i.2001, coll. G. Calixto Female paratype (deposited in FCE-MY 0770) from Rocha, Cabo Polonio, 34°24.0'S, 53°47.0'W, 24. i– 18.iii.2003, coll. F. Achaval. Additional material examined. Male from Rocha, Cabo Polonio, 19.xii.2003-18.iii.2004, coll. F. Achaval. 1m (deposited in FCE-MY 0769), Female from Rocha, Perla de Rocha, 34°25.0'S, 53°51.0'W, i.2001, coll. G. Calixto, 1f (FCE-MY 0766), female from Rocha, Cabo Polonio, 34°24.0'S, 53°47.0'W, 18. i– 18.iii.2005, coll. F. Achaval, 1f (deposited in FCE-MY 0797).
Etymology.
The specific epithet is a noun taken in apposition (chestnut) and is in reference to the brownish coloration of this species.
Diagnosis. Males (Fig. 1A) uniquely possess a tibial apophysis with 4 spines (Fig. 3D). Chaco castanea males differ from Chaco tigre and Chaco socos males by having a palpal organ with a sinuous spermophor and parallel longitudinal ridges (Figs 3 A–C), and by having a PME and AME that are subequal in diameter. Females of Chaco castanea (Fig. 1C) differ from the other known Chaco species by the presence of a large reniform spermathecal receptacle in combination with a short sinuous duct (Fig. 3E).
Description.
Male (holotype). Total length 7.75; carapace 4.13 long, 3.27 wide; eight eyes grouped on a tubercle, AME 0.17; PME 0.13; ALE 0.16; PLE 0.16; OQ 0.86 long, 0.44 wide; clypeus 0.06; fovea 0.63; sternum oval, 1.93 long, 1.56 wide. Posterior sigillae sub-circular, sub-marginal. Labium sub-rectangular, 0.2 long, 0.56 wide; labial cuspules absent; 18/20 maxillary cuspules (Fig. 1B); chelicerae with 7 promarginal teeth of similar size; rastellum with 26 short, thick conical setae on promargin narrowing through retromargin. Leg, palpal measurements in Table 2; chaetotaxy in Table 3. Tarsus I-IV scopula entire; metatarsi I-II distal third, III-IV absent. Anterior tibiae without scopula. STC with numerous teeth in two lateral rows. ITC I-IV absent. Claw tufts absent. Tibial apophysis with 4 prolateral apical spines (Fig. 3D). Palpal organ spermophor strongly sinuous (Figs 3 A–C). Four spinnerets, PMS short monoarticulated, PLS triarticulated apical article short, domed. Spigots without pumpkin-like socket. Body, legs light brown, abdomen with dark brown spots.
Female (paratype). Total length 18.2; carapace 7.2 long, 5.6 wide; caput raised; eight eyes grouped on a tubercle, AME 0.24; PME 0.25; ALE 0.36; PLE 0.31; OQ 0.75 long, 1.6 wide; clypeus 0.14; fovea 0.9; sternum oval, 2.3 long, 2.2 wide. Pos terior sigillae sub-circular, sub-marginal. Labium sub-rectangular, 0.7 long, 1.3 wide; 1 labial cuspule; maxillary cuspules 48/62 (Fig. 1D). Chelicerae with 6 promarginal teeth; first tooth smaller than second, decreasing thereafter; 10 retromarginal denticles; rastellum with 45 short, thick conical setae on promargin. Leg, palpal measure ments in Table 4; chaetotaxy in Table 5. Tarsus I-IV scopula entire, metatarsus I-II entire, III–IV absent. Anterior tibiae without scopula. STC with numerous teeth in two lateral rows. ITC I-IV absent. Claw tufts absent. Palpal claw with 4 teeth in prolateral median line. Two spermathecal receptacles, single sinuous neck; reniform fundus (Fig. 3E). Four spinnerets, PMS short monoarticulated, PLS triarticulated apical article short, domed. Spigots without pumpkin-like socket. Coloration as in male.
Distribution.
Uruguay, Rocha, Perla de Rocha and Cabo Polonio.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |