Siphona selecta (Pandelle, 1894)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2023.013 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3256463E-FEA1-4BA2-AB4D-4161FA1138C4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B43287A9-FFB1-3E5B-C454-AB0EFE0EF944 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Siphona selecta |
status |
|
Siphona selecta View in CoL group
Diagnosis. Male postabdomen: surstylus with some long setae on inner side basally ( Figs 12 View Figs 11–15 , 17 View Figs 16–19 , 21 View Figs 20–24 , 26 View Figs 25–29 , 31 View Figs 30–34 , 36 View Figs 35–39 ); pregonite bare; epiphallus absent; distiphallus subrectangular or subtrapezoidal in lateral view.
Remarks. This group is considered monophyletic, which is supported by the presence of the inner basal setae on the surstylus. This condition is not found in other siphonines except for a few species of Actia ( A. darwini Shima, 1970 , A. destituta Tachi & Shima, 1998 and A. pokharana Shima, 1970 ). ANDERSEN (1996) redescribed two Europe- an species, S. (A.) samarensis and S. (A.) selecta , which have several inner setae on the basal portion of the male surstylus. Additionally, this character state is common to the following species: S. (A.) coactilis sp. nov., S. (A.) kanmiyai sp. nov., S. (A.) laboriosa , S. (A.) matsumotoi sp. nov., and S. (A.) selangor .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |