Smeringopina etome
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162035 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFF8-FF87-B990-C3A0FBC23BBD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smeringopina etome |
status |
|
Smeringopina cornigera (Simon, 1907) View in CoL
Figs. 401–405 View FIGURES 401 – 410 , 421, 424 View FIGURES 416 – 426 , 439–455 View FIGURES 439 – 444 View FIGURES 445 – 455
Smeringopus corniger Simon 1907: 250 –251 (♂). Smeringopina cornigera: Kraus 1957: 233 .
Type. ♂ holotype (together with 1♀; see Note below) from Cameroon, Southwest Region, Buea [4°09.3’N, 9°13.9’E], 800–1200 m a.s.l., vi.–vii.1902 (L. Fea), in MSNG, examined.
Note. The type vial contains 1♂ 1♀ but Simon (1907) only described the male specimen which is therefore regarded a holotype. The female may or may not originate from the same locality. Since females of S. nyasoso are very similar, even its conspecificity with the male holotype is uncertain.
Other material examined. CAMEROON: Southwest Region: Fako Div., Limbe Subdiv., 1.4 km NE Etome (4°03.0’N, 9°07.5’E), ~ 400 m a.s.l., 13.–19.i.1992 (Larcher, Hormiga, Coddington, Griswold, Wanzie), 4♂ 3♀ in CAS; same data, 1♂ 4♀ in USNM.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from most congeners by horns in male ocular area ( Figs. 445–446 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ) and male clypeus with many small modified (globular) hairs on low humps near rim ( Fig. 445–446, 449 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ); from the very similar S. nyasoso and S. kala by shape of procursus (almost circular in lateral view, with rounded posterior process; Figs. 439–440 View FIGURES 439 – 444 ); females may be externally indistinguishable from those of S. nyasoso and S. kala but the anterior epigynal process is apparently smaller than in these two species (note small sample sizes) and the position and shape of pore plates is significantly different from S. kala (compare Figs. 444 View FIGURES 439 – 444 and 467 View FIGURES 462 – 467 ).
Male (NE Etome , CAS). Total body length 4.2, carapace width 1.5. Leg 1: 48.2 (11.0 + 0.5 + 11.7 + 23.0 + 2.0), tibia 2: 7.1, tibia 3: 4.9, tibia 4: 7.4; tibia 1 L/d: 94. Distance PME-PME 230 µm, diameter PME 160 µm, distance PME-ALE 90 µm, distance AME-AME 35 µm, diameter AME 125 µm. Carapace ochre-yellow with triangular brown mark posteriorly, brown pit and brown lateral margins; ocular area not darkened, clypeus with red-brown lateral margins, sternum brown; legs ochre-yellow, darker rings barely visible; abdomen ochre-gray with dark pattern dorsally, laterally, and ventrally. Habitus as in Figs. 401–402 View FIGURES 401 – 410 , ocular area slightly elevated, each triad on additional hump, with two pairs of horns, one long and pointed above ALE, the other short, blunt and slightly more median ( Figs. 445–446 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ), ‘pseudo-lenses’ only visible at PME; clypeus with pair of low humps near rim, each with ~20 small modified (globular) hairs, with small depression between humps ( Figs. 445–446 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ); deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 442 View FIGURES 439 – 444 , with lateral proximal apophyses and short distal apophyses, the latter and frontal cheliceral face with ~20 small modified (globular) hairs on each side ( Fig. 450 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ). Palps as in Figs. 403–405 View FIGURES 401 – 410 ; coxa with retrolateral apophysis; trochanter with small ventral apophysis; femur with weakly sclerotized retrolateral flap and large whitish area ventrally, without prolateral modification; prolateral femur-patella joint only slightly shifted toward ventrally; tarsus with some longer but only slightly stronger hairs dorsally; procursus almost circular in lateral view, with rounded posterior process, without hinge, with many hairs on retrolateral face and pointed membranous process on prolateral side ( Figs. 439–440 View FIGURES 439 – 444 , 447–448, 451 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ); bulb with simple small embolus with small pointed process ( Fig. 441 View FIGURES 439 – 444 ). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs, retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae; pseudosegments barely visible. ALS with eight spigots each; gonopore with two epiandrous spigots ( Fig. 453 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ).
Variation. Tibia 1 in three other males: 10.1 (holotype), 10.5, 10.7. The holotype is slightly bleached but in good condition.
Female. In general similar to male; clypeus unmodified, with two dark bands from eye triads to rim; ocular area with one pair of low humps above ALE. Tibia 1 in 7 females: 7.2–8.4 (mean 7.8). Epigynum anterior plate trapezoidal, with very small anterior process, lateral edges drawn backwards ( Figs. 421 View FIGURES 416 – 426 , 443 View FIGURES 439 – 444 , 455 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ); large flat posterior plate; internal genitalia as in Figs. 424 View FIGURES 416 – 426 and 444 View FIGURES 439 – 444 . ALS with eight spigots each ( Fig. 452 View FIGURES 445 – 455 ).
Distribution. Known from two localities in southwestern Cameroon ( Fig. 390 View FIGURE 390 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |