Philoliche (Philoliche) aethiopica (Thunberg, 1789)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.049.0105 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7649421 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B17087D2-5930-FFFE-31DF-FB88FB88FBCC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Philoliche (Philoliche) aethiopica |
status |
|
Key to species in the Philoliche (Philoliche) aethiopica View in CoL View at ENA species complex
1 Holoptic: eyes meeting or nearly meeting in front (males) .................................. 2
– Dichoptic: eyes clearly separated, not touching or close to touching at any point (females) ............................................................................................................... 3
2 Fore tarsi with long process on first and second segments (lappets); eye facets all of similar size or only gradually increasing in size from ventral to dorsal; eyes meeting until slightly above antennae leaving a small triangle of a frons (aethiopica group).................................................................................................................... 4
– Fore tarsi without long process on first and second segments; if process exists, it does not extend beyond the distal margin of the third tarsomere; eye facets abruptly increasing in size from ventral to dorsal forming a demarcating, horizontal line; eyes contiguous to near the base of antennae, no vestige of frons remaining (rondani group).................................................................................................................... 5
3 Ratio of frons width at base to frons width at vertex greater than or equal to 2.1 ( Fig. 3b View Fig ) (aethiopica group) ................................................................................. 4
– Ratio of frons width at base to frons width at vertex less than 2.1 ( Fig. 3a View Fig ) (rondani group).................................................................................................................... 5
4 Dorsum of mesothorax with distinct, narrow, grey sublateral stripes. Females: females are not yet known for this species; this is their provisional outcome in this key as predicted by the distribution of other characters in the group ..................... ................................................................................................... formosa (Austen) View in CoL
– Dorsum of mesothorax without stripes, or with indistinct, broad, dull reddish or greyish ones ....................................................................... aethiopica (Thunberg) View in CoL
5 Dorsum of mesothorax with grey band on lateral margins and with grey on posterior margin; scutellum greyish pink ( Fig. 1 View Fig ) ............................................................... 6
– Dorsum of mesothorax with grey band on lateral margins, but not on posterior margin; scutellum concolourous with centre of mesothorax, not greyish pink .... 7
6 Grey posterior margin of mesothorax sharply contrasting with brown at centre; frons generally light coloured and pollinose, not wholly shiny ( Fig. 1b View Fig ) .... elegans (Bigot) View in CoL
– Grey posterior margin of mesothorax gradually blending into brown anteriorly; frons generally dark and shiny. If frons pollinose, then only along eye margin ( Fig. 1a View Fig ) ....................................................................................... rubiginosa Dias
7 All legs similarly coloured on proximal segments: coxae grey, paler dorsally and with white hairs; trochanters black; femora orange. Posterolateral margin of segments 4 and 5 with tufts of black or white hairs as follows: 4 – white only, 5 – black and white ....................................................................... rondani (Bertoloni) View in CoL
– Fore and mid legs similarly coloured, hind legs different: fore and mid coxae grey to pinkish grey, paler dorsally and with white and a few black hairs, trochanters black; hind coxa yellow, trochanters orange; fore and mid femora orange, hind femur yellow, same as hind coxa. Tibia of foreleg and midleg paler than femora. Hind tibia darker than hind femur, with black hairs. Posterolateral margin of segments 4 and 5 with tufts of black or white hairs as follows: 4 – black and white, 5 – black only. Third abdominal segment relatively paler dorsally than the other abdominal segments. Proboscis usually 2× greater in length than P. rondani View in CoL . Known from the Albany Centre of endemism only......... umbratipennis (Ricardo) View in CoL stat. rev.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |