Schinia erosa Smith
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157415 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A669FFF-2F7F-4481-858A-8524E3AE40AB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6269760 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B11687FD-FFB3-FFEC-FEE0-FDD5FE158EF0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Schinia erosa Smith |
status |
|
Schinia erosa Smith View in CoL
( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 12 – 18 , 23 View FIGURES 19 – 24 , 31–32 View FIGURES 25 – 34 , 41 View FIGURES 41 – 44 , 43, 48 View FIGURES 48 – 49 )
Schinia erosa Smith 1906:23 View in CoL .— McDunnough 1938:105.— Todd 1982:76. — Poole 1989:894. — Poole and Gentili 1996:771.— Hardwick 1996:178.
Schinia albafascia erosa View in CoL ;— Barnes and McDunnough 1917:39.— Franclemont and Todd 1983:159.
Diagnosis. Schinia erosa looks like a washed out S. brunnea . The maculation consists of a reniform spot and in some specimens a faint orbicular spot, with rufous to cream ground color. Schinia brunnea has brown to reddishbrown ground color, an antemedial line, postmedial line, and darker areas in the subterminal area of forewing. The discal spot and marginal band in the hindwing are usually less distinct in erosa than in brunnea . The second sternite in the male abdomen has a vestigial hair pencil in erosa (Fig, 23), which is well developed in brunnea ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ). In the male genitalia, the most obvious difference is the much shorter uncus and valve in erosa ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 25 – 34 ) than in brunnea ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 25 – 34 ). In the female genitalia, the papillae anales are slightly larger and more slender with a shaper apex in erosa ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ); in brunnea ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ) they are somewhat shorter with a slightly more rounded apex.
Description. Abdomen ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 24 ): Second sternite with vestigial hair pencil (usually only a few androconia) and welldeveloped scent pocket. Male genitalia ( Figs. 31–32 View FIGURES 25 – 34 ): Uncus short, length 0.70–0.85 mm (mean = 0.78 + 0.051; n=6); valve short, length 2.15– 2.35 mm (mean = 2.25 + 0.089; n=6), length 7.65 + 0.71 X width (n=6); saccus narrowly Vshaped; vesica with 3 coils. Female genitalia ( Figs. 41, 43 View FIGURES 41 – 44 ): Papillae anales broadly triangulate, apex pointed; eighth segment with coarse scobinations; seventh segment with robust, moderate length setae in several rows along distal margin, concentrated dorsally on segment, extending to or shorter than distal margin of eighth segment.
Type material. Lectotype male, in AMNH, designated by Todd (1982). Type locality: Utah [no specific locality]. Not examined.
Larval food plant. Isocoma acradenia var. acradenia (E. Greene) E. Greene (Asteraceae) .
Biology. Hardwick (1996) gave a detailed description of the life history and larva of erosa . Larvae feed on the nominate variety of Isocoma acradenia (Greene) Greene (Asteraceae) , Desert Goldenweed or Alkali Jimmy weed. Desert Goldenweed is a low shrub of alkaline soils, growing along seeps, springs, roadsides, and disturbed areas. It is associated with Atriplex , Artemisia and Elymus ( Kartesz 1987) .
Flight period. The main flight seems to be from late summer into early November. Infrequent captures in early May probably are due to favorable weather conditions during particular years, and not evidence of a spring brood. The May specimens were collected only in 1918, the late summer and fall specimens were collected in several years ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).
Distribution ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 48 – 49 ). From desert areas east of the Peninsular Range of southern California and a single locality in south central Arizona.
Material examined. ARIZONA: MARICOPA CO., Phoenix, (1ɗ) male genitalia slide USNM 46826, 16 –23 Sep. (1ɗ), male genitalia slide USNM 46845, Barnes Coll. CALIFORNIA: RIVERSIDE CO., Chino Canyon, nr. Palm Springs (2ɗ); Coachella, 21 Aug. 1936 (1Ψ); Indio (1Ψ), 1 May 1918 (3ɗ, 5Ψ), male genitalia slide USNM 46843, J.C. Bradley, Oct. (1Ψ), female genitalia slide USNM 47161, Barnes Coll., 23 Oct. 1911 (1Ψ), 27 Oct. 1911 (1ɗ), male genitalia slide USNM 46842, 30 Oct. 1923 (1Ψ), H.G. Dyar, 1 Nov. 1911 (1Ψ). SAN BERNARDINO CO., San Bernardino, (1ɗ) male genitalia slide USNM 47160. SAN DIEGO CO., Sentenac Canyon, 22 Sep. 1935 (1ɗ, 2Ψ), female genitalia slide USNM 47162, D. Meadows; The Narrows, 22 Sep. 1935 (1ɗ, 2Ψ), D. Meadows.
Discussion. The locality label of the lectotype specimen of S. erosa designated by Todd (1982) is “Utah", but this is probably erroneous because all other records are from the Colorado and Mojave deserts of southern California and adjacent Arizona. The other 2 syntypes, 1 male in USNM and 1 female in AMNH, are from Phoenix, Arizona, which is a more logical type locality.
Barnes and McDunnough (1917) treated S. erosa as a subspecies of S. albafascia , and this decision was followed by Franclemont and Todd (1983). Poole (1989) and Poole and Gentili (1996) synonymized all subspecies, treating erosa as a synonym of albafascia . Hardwick (1996) elevated erosa to species level based on host plant and distribution, and we agree with the latter on the basis of the host plant distribution and the characters discussed above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Heliothinae |
Genus |
Schinia erosa Smith
Pogue, Michael G. & Harp, Charles E. 2004 |
Schinia albafascia erosa
Franclemont 1983: 159 |
Barnes 1917: 39 |
Schinia erosa
Poole 1996: 771 |
Hardwick 1996: 178 |
Poole 1989: 894 |
Todd 1982: 76 |
McDunnough 1938: 105 |
Smith 1906: 23 |