Tapinoma
publication ID |
21200 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6251268 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AFED52AB-7071-82D5-0A2D-C39C1D916D73 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Tapinoma |
status |
|
Within the Dolichoderinae HNS two genera, Tapinoma HNS and Technomyrmex HNS , are isolated in their female castes by the synapomorphic extreme reduction of the petiole and its accommodation in a longitudinal groove or impression in the ventral surface of the first gastral tergite, which overhangs and conceals the petiole in dorsal view when the mesosoma and gaster are aligned. The petiole is so reduced in these two genera that in profile there is no trace of a node or scale; at most there is a very short raised surface immediately behind the peduncle. The function of this raised surface is to provide an insertion-site for the exterior levator muscle of the petiole. Pseudaphomomyrmex HNS exhibits these structures.
Technomyrmex HNS and Tapinoma HNS are separated in the female castes by the contrasting morphologies of their gastral apices. In Technomyrmex HNS the sclerites of the gastral apex are unspecialised, except that the pygidium is small. Gastral tergite 5 is therefore in line with tergites 1 - 4 and as a result all five tergites are visible in dorsal view. In contrast the pygidium in Tapinoma HNS is reflexed, the fifth tergite being folded back and down, below the fourth tergite, and is clearly visible in ventral view. Also in that view the fourth tergite frequently forms a distinct projecting rim above the reflexed fifth. In consequence only gastral tergites 1 - 4 are visible in dorsal view. Pseudaphomomyrmex HNS exhibits the latter morphology, which is uniquely characteristic of Tapinoma HNS , and thus the former name is relegated to the synonymy of the latter.
As a result of the above analysis the taxonomic synopses of genus Tapinoma View in CoL HNS , and of the two names in the speciesgroup that are affected by the genus-group modifications, are amended as follows.
Tapinoma Foerster HNS , 1850: 43. Type-species: Tapinoma collina Foerster HNS , 1850: 43 [junior synonym of Formica erratica Latreille HNS , 1798: 44], by monotypy.
Micromyrma Dufour HNS , 1857: 60. Type-species: Micromyrma pygmaea Dufour HNS , 1857: 61, by monotypy. [Synonymy by Mayr, 1863: 455, confirmed by Shattuck, 1992: 146.]
Semonius Forel HNS , 1910b: 21. Type-species: Semonius schultzei Forel HNS , 1910b: 21, by monotypy. [Synonymy by Shattuck, 1992: 146.]
Pseudaphomomyrmex Wheeler HNS , 1920: 53. Type-species: Aphomyrmex emeryi Ashmead HNS , 1905: 111, by original designation. Syn. n.
Zatapinoma Wheeler HNS , 1928: 20. Type-species: Zatapinoma annandalei Wheeler HNS , 1928: 20, by original designation. [Synonymy by Shattuck, 1992: 146.]
Neoclystopsenella Kurian HNS , 1955: 133. Type-species: Neoclystopsenella luffae Kurian HNS , 1955: 133, by monotypy. [Synonym by Brown, 1988: 337.]
Comments
1 At various times in its history Micromyrma HNS has been regarded as a genus, a subgenus of Tapinoma HNS and a junior synonym of Tapinoma HNS . A short synopsis of the authors responsible for these opinions through time is presented in Bolton (2003). The two authors of synonymy given above are emphatically supported here.
2 Note that Tapinoptera Santschi HNS (1925: 348), formerly regarded as a junior synonym of Tapinoma HNS (e.g. Shattuck 1992: 146; Bolton 2003: 91) is now known to be a junior synonym of Technomyrmex Mayr HNS , 1872, and will be dealt with in a forthcoming taxonomic revision of Technomyrmex HNS by Bolton (in preparation). It has therefore been deleted from the taxonomic synopsis of Tapinoma HNS .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |