Metoisops Popov and Herczek, 1992
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.00991.2022 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10988602 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD773D19-FFDF-FF93-FF23-E38F4293A020 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Metoisops Popov and Herczek, 1992 |
status |
|
Genus Metoisops Popov and Herczek, 1992 View in CoL
Type species: Metoisops kerzhneri Popov and Herczek, 1992 ; Poland, Baltic amber, mid-Eocene (ca. 44.1±1.1 Ma according to Wappler 2005).
Emended diagnosis.—Differs from other extinct genera in the subfamily Isometopinae by body elongated oval, small to moderate, approximately 2.4–3.3 mm; dorsum deeply punctate, covered with densely long and golden pubescence; compound eye slightly prominent; ocelli large or medium sized; length of second antennal segment almost same as third and fourth segments combined; in some species fourth antennal segment subdivided; vertex wide; labium exceeding hind coxae, reaching first or third abdominal segment; posterior margin of pronotum straight or slightly concave in middle; pronotal collar narrow; calli weakly swollen; propleuron distinctly punctate ( Figs. 2A 2 View Fig , 3A View Fig 2 View Fig , A 3 View Fig ); mesoscutum narrowly or normally developed; hemelytral membrane with two cells; tarsi two segmented.
Description.—See Herczek and Popov (2014) for detailed redescription.
Remarks.—We propose herein the tribal replacement of Metoisops to the Gigantometopini based on the major morphological characters. See the discussion section below for details.
Herczek and Popov (2014) provided illustrations of each fossil specimen classified to Metoisops to date. In some species (e.g., Metoisops intergerivus Herczek and Popov, 2014 , and Metoisops punctatus Popov and Herczek, 1993 ), the fourth antennal segment is subdivided, reminiscent of the antennae with five or six segments, what is unique in Miridae . Nonetheless, the species possessing the subdivided fourth antennal segment are currently affiliated in the same genus. At this point, these species remain in Metoisops pending fourth segment evaluation and confirmation of the monophyly based on the phylogenetic approach. The state of fourth antennal segment subdivided may be used as a diagnostic character for the subgeneric subdivision in accordance to the phylogenetic result.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.