Probillingsites Foerste, 1928
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2013.41 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A2F1B9ED-870A-466E-B35E-BD5DA782476E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3815144 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD4D9054-CD31-6A30-F026-42D6FD52FD0E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Probillingsites Foerste, 1928 |
status |
|
Genus Probillingsites Foerste, 1928
Type species
Probillingsites welleri Foerste, 1928 , Wisconsin, USA; probably Galena Dolomite, early-mid Katian, Ordovician; by original designation.
Emended diagnosis
Cyrtocones with truncated conch; mature conch inflated, higher than long or height similar to length; conch cross section circular to depressed; mature sutures generally oblique and slightly sinuous or sigmoid, but not lacunose; septal necks in latest septa strongly recumbent, cyrtochoanitic, in earlier septa suborthocoanitic; siphuncular segments expanded.
Remarks
The morphology of Probillingsites scandinavicum sp. nov. indicates that the concept of Probillingsites requires adjustment as it is transitional between Redpathoceras and typical Probillingsites . In fact, the distinction between Redpathoceras and Probillingsites must be drawn relatively arbitrarily at the tenuous border between a mature body chamber characterized as “strongly inflated” ( Probillingsites ) or “inflated” ( Redpathoceras ), or between a mature truncated conch that is “obese” ( Probillingsites ) or breviconic ( Redpathoceras ). The ratio of the height/length of the mature conch may be used as a quantitative measure to distinguish between the two genera. In Redpathoceras clarki Flower, 1963 , the type of Redpathoceras , this ratio is 0.48 and in R. magum sp. nov. and R. bullatum it is 0.46; in typical Probillingsites the height is greater than or equal to the length. In P. scandinavicum sp. nov. this ratio is 0.52. Consequently, here Probillingsites is restricted to Probillingsitidae with conch heights that are greater than or equal to the mature conch length.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |