Milichilinus Reitter, 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.175789 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6247638 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC7B421F-FFBB-1D0C-FF73-29FFFD919635 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Milichilinus Reitter, 1908 |
status |
|
Milichilinus Reitter, 1908 View in CoL
(Figs.1–6)
Milichilinus Reitter, 1908 View in CoL was described as a subgenus of Xantholinus Dejean, 1821 View in CoL for the species decorus Erichson, 1839 View in CoL and ever since has been considered a subgenus ( Herman 2001). Although similar externally to Xantholinus View in CoL , Milichilinus View in CoL differs in having a maxillary palpus with short terminal segment only slightly narrower than segment 3 which, in turn, is longer than segment 2 (Fig. 1), a similarly-shaped labial palpus (Fig. 2), a short labrum with externally extended lobules and a narrow median V-like emargination (Fig. 3), very faint frontal and ocular grooves, a medially sclerotized and laterally impressed antesternal plate and, finally, feebly dilated anterior tarsi.
It is also distinguished by the shape of the male genital segment which has distally dilated pleurites, a predominantly filiform tergite X (Fig. 4), sternite IX almost totally covered with very long dense spinules, conditions not found in any other Xantholininae (Fig. 5). In the genus Xantholinus View in CoL the aedeagus has no parameres (reduced to vestiges). In Milichilinus View in CoL the aedeagus has large, very long semimembranous and asymmetrical parameres (Fig. 6). Illustrations of stenite IX and the aedeagus of both Milichilinus View in CoL species are provided by Assing (2006).
In light of the above, I consider Milichilinus to be a distinct genus which presently includes two species: M. decorus ( Erichson, 1839) (the type species, by monotypy) [see Smetana (2004) for its distribution] and M. meybohmi Assing, 2006 from Turkey (Kahramanmaraş).
The illustration in Coiffait (1972: Fig. 84, A) probably refers to M. decorus , but it is apparently based on an aedeagus with the parameres removed in the process of dissection.
Based on the shape of the aedeagus (especially the large, asymmetrical and semimembranous parameres) Milichilinus is the only Palaearctic xantholinine with affinities to Oriental genera, such as Sumatera Bordoni, 2002 or Atopolinus Coiffait, 1982 ( Bordoni 2002) .
From this follow the resulting new combinations:
Milichilinus decorus ( Erichson, 1839) View in CoL , comb. nov.
Milichilinus meybohmi ( Assing, 2006) View in CoL , comb. nov.
FIGURES 1–6. Milichilinus decorus (Erichson) View in CoL : maxillary palpus (1), labial palpus (2), labrum (3), male genital segment (4), sternite IX (5), aedeagus (6).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Milichilinus Reitter, 1908
Bordoni, Arnaldo 2007 |
Milichilinus meybohmi (
Assing 2006 |
Milichilinus
Reitter 1908 |
decorus
Erichson 1839 |
Milichilinus decorus (
Erichson 1839 |
Xantholinus
Dejean 1821 |