Petrocallis fenestrata Boiss. & Hohen.

AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle, 2019, Typification of Edmond Boissier’s Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) names enumerated in Flora Orientalis, Boissiera 72, pp. 1-193 : 109

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7630433
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7637281
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC0E341D-FFD0-8320-FF4C-5D55FAADFDB6
treatment provided by	Carolina
scientific name	Petrocallis fenestrata Boiss. & Hohen.
status

Treatment

Petrocallis fenestrata Boiss. & Hohen. View in CoL in Boiss., Diagn. Pl. Orient. 8: 27. 1849.

 Elburzia fenestrata (Boiss. & Hohen.) Hedge View in CoL in Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 29: 181. 1969.

 Didymophysa fenestrata (Boiss. & Hohen.) Esmailbegi & Al-Shehbaz View in CoL in Taxon 67: 334. 2018.

Type: “Hab. in saxosis Meidan Abdallah in valle Loura montis Elbrus Kotschy Nº 493 et 795”.

Lectotypus (designated here): IRAN: “In saxosis Meidan Abdullah in valle Loura m. Elbrus”, 15.VII.1843, Kotschy 493a 795 ( G-BOIS [ G00332464 ]; isolecto-: P [ P02272395 ], W [ W0053489 ]) .

Notes. – BOISSIER (1849) based the species description on the unicate in his herbarium and on P 02272395 that he annotated and, therefore, lectotypification of the name is justified.

Both Kotschy 493a and Kotschy 795 are listed in protologue and on the labels of the lectotype and W0053489 . By contrast, the label of P duplicate has only Kotschy 493a. Since the other information on all duplicates of the type collection is identical, it is not possible to determine why Kotschy used both numbers on the lectotype and W isolectotype duplicates.

Following its transfer to Elburzia Hedge by HEDGE (1969), the species remained in that genus to the present. However, molecular phylogenetic studies by ESMAILBEGI et al. (2018) strongly support its assignment to Didymophysa .