Arabis cadmea Boiss., Diagn. Pl.

AL-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. & Barriera, Gabrielle, 2019, Typification of Edmond Boissier’s Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) names enumerated in Flora Orientalis, Boissiera 72, pp. 1-193 : 26

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7630433
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7630889
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC0E341D-FFA7-8357-FCE5-5975FC62FBE7
treatment provided by	Carolina
scientific name	Arabis cadmea Boiss., Diagn. Pl.
status

Treatment

Arabis cadmea Boiss., Diagn. Pl. View in CoL Orient. 8: 21. 1849.

Type: “Hab. in pinguibus arenosis Cadmi orientalis suprà Colossam in Cariâ alt. 5000'-6000'. Legi [Boissier] Junio 1842 ”.

Lectotypus (designated here): TURKEY: “regio alpina Cadmi suprà Colossam”, VIII.1842, Boissier s.n. ( G-BOIS [ G00332063 ]; isolecto-: JE [ JE00003186 ]) . Syntypi: TURKEY: “Cadmes ad or. Denisleh in arenosis panguibus”, VI . s.a., Boissier s.n. ( G-BOIS [ G00332064 ]); “ Cadmus orientalis ”, VI.1842 , Boissier s.n. ( K [ K000693259 , K000693260 ]) .

= Arabis auriculata Lam., Encycl. 1: 219. 1783.

Notes. – Based on MERMOUD (1980), the two collections were made only a few days apart starting at Denisleh then Khonas (= Colossas). It appears that Boissier mixed the collection month because the lectotype has flowers and fruit, and the second collection has fully mature fruit.

The mere listing of the above lectotype as type by TAN (2002) does not constitute a valid lectotypification of the species (see TURLAND et al., 2018: Art. 9, note 6; MCNEILL, 2014).

The lectotype is a collection folder of two sheets one of which is unlabeled.