Agamopus joker, Costa-Silva & Carvalho & Vaz-De, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.806.1703 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D0442F62-6E6D-47DF-AFFE-443472343037 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6391059 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AB4D2B10-FFAA-B512-FD6E-FAEF85CA3921 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Agamopus joker |
status |
sp. nov. |
Agamopus joker View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:81A805C8-E8AD-4224-88C1-B0A1256E9A0D
Figs 3–4 View Fig View Fig , 5B View Fig
Differential diagnosis
Agamopus joker sp. nov. shares with A. viridis the presence of two small tubercles on the head ( Fig. 5B View Fig – white arrows). However, the two species can easily be distinguished by the shape of the pygidial sulcus, which is arched in A. viridis (and other Agamopus species – as in Fig. 9E View Fig ), but sinuous in A. joker ( Fig. 4D View Fig ). Furthermore, the inner edge of the metatibia is noticeably curved and strongly crenulate in A. joker , being unique among representatives of the genus ( Fig. 4C View Fig ). Also, A. joker has the apex of the parameres abruptly curved downwards and flattened dorso-ventrally ( Fig. 4E View Fig ), differing from other species of Agamopus .
Etymology
The specific name ‘ joker ’, an English proper noun in the nominative case used in apposition, is an eponym after the homonymous supervillain from the DC Comics Universe. It is a reference to the sinuous pygidial sulcus of this species, which resembles the shape of a smiley clown’s mouth.
Type material
Holotype BRAZIL • ♂; first label [aged white, unknown handwriting]: “2 – 49 [vertical] / P. Grossa / Lageado.”; second label [aged white, unknown handwriting]: “5211 [vertical] / Agamopus / viridis / Bouc.”; third label [aged white, Pereira's handwriting]: " Agamopus / viridis 5211 / Bouc. / P. Pereira det. [typeset] 99 [Pereira's handwriting]"; fourth label [red with black border, printed]: Agamopus joker ♂ / Costa-Silva et al., 2022 / HOLOTYPE"; CEMT ( Fig. 4G View Fig ).
Holotype description
Habitus as in Figs 4A‒B View Fig . Colour: dark brown, metallic. Oblong body. Length: 5.6 mm (excluding head). Width: 3.8 mm.
HEAD. Hemispheric. Surface with dense punctation; anterior half foveolate-puncticulate and with erect yellow setae. Clypeal margin and lateral margin of head with yellow setae projecting from underneath. Two triangular clypeal teeth, separation between teeth V-shaped. Lateral clypeal carina well-defined and
oblique (as in Fig. 5B View Fig – red arrows), ending in small tubercle on each side. Antennae yellow; antennal club covered by small golden bristles.
PRONOTUM. Dark brown, metallic, shiny. Wider (3.18 mm) than long (1.7 mm); delimited by carina around. Surface covered by dense and homogeneous punctation ( Figs 4A View Fig and 5B View Fig ). Anterior angles rounded, pointed forward. Lateral margin smooth; rounded. Hypomeron with surface subtly rugose and densely punctate; anterior half deeply excavated, separated from posterior half by well-defined carina; posterior half with a longitudinal keel slightly marked, parallel with lateral margin ( Fig. 4B View Fig – black arrow).
MESOVENTRITE. Trapezoidal; anterior margin wider than posterior. Surface fully punctated. Mesometasternal suture straight.
METAVENTRITE. Fully punctated. Punctures larger and well-marked between mesocoxae; punctures slightly smaller in the posteromedial region ( Fig. 4B View Fig ).
ELYTRA. Suboval. Lateral margins slightly angled. Seven striae well-defined; punctation equidistant on each stria. Surface of interstriae covered by micropunctation.
LEGS. All fully covered by punctation. Protibiae slightly curved; three main teeth on outer edge and subtly crenulated to the base; inner apical angle of protibiae ~ 90°; ventral surface with longitudinal carina from base to apex. Meso- and metafemora with posterior edge smooth. Mesotibiae gradually widened apically; apical width approximately 1/4 of total length. Metatibiae visibly arched; inner edge crenulate with yellow setae ( Fig. 4C View Fig ); parallel margins in the anterior half, expanding slightly in the posterior half. Inner margin with a projection beyond apex, near to the spur. First to fourth protarsomeres almost rounded; 5 th tarsomere elongate, longer than first three tarsomeres culminated; apex truncate. Meso- and metatarsomeres equal in shape and length; first to third tarsomeres with dense ventral yellow setae. Tarsal claws falciform; longer than first tarsomere ( Fig. 4A–C View Fig ).
ABDOMEN. Six ventrites; each ventrite with row of punctation in the anterior margin; sides with sparse punctation. Lateral part of each ventrite longer than in the middle. Sixth ventrite completely covered by well-marked punctation.
PYGIDIUM. Wider than long; glabrous, covered by micropunctation. Deep transverse and sinuous sulcus in centre of disc ( Fig. 4D View Fig ).
MALE GENITALIA. Lateral view: parameres symmetrical; phallobase with dorsal gibbosity near base ( Fig. 4E View Fig – black arrow); distal portion of parameres abruptly curved downwards ( Fig. 4E View Fig ). Dorsal view: tips of parameres trapezoidal, expanded laterally, pointed ( Fig. 4F View Fig ).
Female
Unknown.
Geographic distribution
The species is only known from type locality, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil ( Fig. 3 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Scarabaeoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Scarabaeinae |
Tribe |
Ateuchini |
Genus |