Mesodiplatys Steinmann, 1986

Anisyutkin, Leonid N., 2014, Mesodiplatys venado sp. nov. (Dermaptera: Diplatyidae), probable evidence of contact between Neotropical and Malagasy faunas, Zootaxa 3794 (4), pp. 593-599 : 594

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3794.4.11

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EFFE09E5-3F9B-4A58-A56A-97E962323981

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6137717

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AA768788-FFDB-FFCD-FF14-DC8A6670F94A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mesodiplatys Steinmann, 1986
status

 

Genus Mesodiplatys Steinmann, 1986 View in CoL , stat. nov.

Type species: Diplatys nana Burr, 1914 , by original designation.

Diagnosis. Head differentiated into frontal and occipital regions; eyes large and prominent ( Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 12 , 13, 14 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Metaparameres roughly trapezoidal in shape, widened proximally, apex without cleft or armament, more or less tapered apically to form small outgrowth ( Figs. 10, 12 View FIGURES 1 – 12 , 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Virga divided into unpaired short and dilated proximal part and paired long, simple and whip-like distal parts; complicated accessory sclerites absent ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURES 1 – 12 , 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).

Composition. Mesodiplatys nanus (Burr) , M. gracillimus (Hincks) , M. longicornis (Hincks) , M. major (Brindle) , M. mucronatus (Hincks) , M. raharizoninai (Brindle) , M. olsufiewi (Borelli) , M. insularis (Borelli) .

Notes. The genus Mesodiplatys was originally described as a subgenus of the genus Haplodiplatys Hincks, 1955 . The subgenus Haplodiplatys was described as monotypic, containing only H. niger Hincks, 1955 from Kumaon, Northern India ( Hincks 1955). Haplodiplatys niger is morphologically quite distinct and distant from the representatives of the genus Mesodiplatys : “Closely related to Diplatys but differing in the entirely simple head, small eyes, gynecoid abdomen, simple, cylindrical forceps and simple ultimate tergite" ( Hincks 1955, p. 17), excluding the presence of the metaparameres with simple apices. Therefore, Mesodiplatys should not be included in Haplodiplatys .

Mesodiplatys nanus View in CoL , M. gracillimus View in CoL , M. longicornis View in CoL , M. major View in CoL , M. mucronatus View in CoL and M. raharizoninai View in CoL were consigned to the subgenus Mesodiplatys View in CoL by Steinmann (1986). Mesodiplatys olsufiewi was assigned to the subgenus Haplodiplatys ( Steinmann 1986) , but the structure of the male genitalia in this species ( Brindle 1966) is completely similar to that of Mesodiplatys View in CoL . The structure of the male genitalia of M. insularis View in CoL was not illustrated, but according to the original description ( Borelli 1932), the metaparameres of this species are simple and the branches of the virga are very long.

In the original description of Mesodiplatys View in CoL , the virga are incorrectly reported as "... without unpaired but with very long paired sections" ( Steinmann 1986, p. 171). The distinct unpaired short proximal part of the virga is clearly visible in all representatives of the genus Mesidiplatys ( Figs. 10, 11 View FIGURES 1 – 12 ; also see Figs. 17 View FIGURES 13 – 18 , 19 in Hincks (1955), and Figs. 8–13 View FIGURES 1 – 12 View FIGURES 13 – 18 in Brindle (1966)).

Several African Diplatys View in CoL spp. have long, whip-like distal parts of the virga: D. aethiops Burr View in CoL , D. bicolor (Dubrony) , D. burri Hincks View in CoL , D. longipennis Brindle View in CoL , D. gedyei Hincks View in CoL , D. rotundicollis Hincks View in CoL , D. schoutedeni Hincks View in CoL , and D. simplex Hincks. All View in CoL of them strongly differ from the representatives of the genus Mesodiplatys View in CoL by the structure of the metaparameres, which are apically toothed or cleft ( Hincks 1955; Brindle 1966, 1969, 1973). Moreover, some species (for instance, D. aethiops View in CoL , D. burri View in CoL , D. gedyei View in CoL , and D. longipennis View in CoL ) are characterized by a specialized structure of the virga, different from that of Mesodiplatys View in CoL ( Hincks 1955; Brindle 1969). Diplatys saxeus Brindle, 1982 View in CoL , described from Zimbabwe, is similar to species of Mesodiplatys View in CoL in the simple shape of the metaparameres and the long whip-like distal parts of the virga, but differs in having small eyes, shortened tegmina and reduced wings ( Brindle 1982).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Dermaptera

Family

Diplatyidae

Loc

Mesodiplatys Steinmann, 1986

Anisyutkin, Leonid N. 2014
2014
Loc

Haplodiplatys (

Steinmann 1986
1986
Loc

Diplatys saxeus

Brindle 1982
1982
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF