Sunius cercii, Anlaş, Sinan, 2019
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.65.3.235.2019 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E53C5574-89D0-435E-9517-E37271B5561D |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A93D0F19-BF45-FFC4-D631-D6BAFC0CA71D |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Sunius cercii |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Sunius cercii View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs 9–16, 17)
Typematerial – Holotype: TURKEY: m, ‘‘TR. Konya, Hadim, Çiftepınar 5 36°58’21”N, 32°41’05”E, 1990 m, 03.V.2018, leg. Örgel & Yaman / Holotypus m, Sunius GoogleMaps
sp. n. det. S. Anlaş 2019” ( AZMM). Paratypes: 3 m , 11 f, samedataasholotype (AZMM
TWO NEW SUNIUS SPECIES FROM ANATOLIA ( COLEOPTERA : STAPHYLINIDAE ) 239
NHMO). TURKEY: 1 m, 10 f, TR. Karaman, Ermenek, Balkusan , 36°48’43”N, 32°53’35”E 1890 m, 02. GoogleMaps V.2018, by MSS traps, leg. Örgel & Yaman ( AZMM, NHMO) .
Etymology – ThespecificepithethonorsBarışÇerci, Ankara, aspecialistonHeteroptera, whohascarriedoutimportantentomologicalresearchesinTurkey.
Description – HabitusasinFig. 9. Smallspecies, bodylength 2.4–2.7 mm, similarto S. orgeli , butdistinguishedasfollows:
Headoblong ( Figs 9-10), approximately 1.20–1.25 timesaslongaswide; antennae approximately 0.68–0.74 mmlong. Pronotumapproximately 0.95 timesaswideashead ( Figs 9–10). Elytra ( Figs 9–10) slightly (approximately 1.05 times) widerthanpronotum andatsutureabout 0.70–0.75 timesaslongaspronotum. Abdomenapproximatelyaswide aselytra ( Fig. 9).
m: sterniteVIIinposteriormedianareaveryslightlyconcaveandwithoutmodified setae, ( Fig. 11); posteriormarginofsterniteVIIIwithrelativelywideemargination, poste- riorlywithmedianclusterofveryweakpubescence, withouttubercule ( Fig. 12); aedeagus approximately 0.32–0.35 mmlong, shapedasinFigs 13–16, withapicalportionofventral processdentate, withbroaderandstouterventralprocessinlateralview; internalsacwith aseriesofsixmixedlargeandsmallspines.
Comparativenotes – Thespeciescanbedistinguishedfromallitsconge- ners by the different shape of the ventral process of the aedeagus and by the shapeofthespinesoftheinternalsac. Basedonthesimilarmorphologyof themaleprimaryandsecondarysexualcharacters, thenewspeciesisclosely relatedto S. yamani Anlaş, 2018 ( Konya, Derebucak), S. ulcerosus Assing, 2011 ( Isparta, DedegölMountains) and S. brachati Assing, 2003 ( Antalya, Finike) Thenewspeciesisreadilyseparatedfromthesespeciesasfollows:
From S. yamani by the slender ventral process of the aedeagus in lateral view, bythedifferentshapeandtheseriesofsixuniformlysizedspinesin theinternalsac (in S. yamani : internalsacwithaseriesoffivemixedlargeand smallspines).
From S. ulcerosus by the absence of a tubercule on abdominal sternite VIII (in S. ulcerosus : sterniteVIIIposteriorlywithamediansubcircularprotuberance) by the broader and stouter ventral process of the aedeagus in lateral view, by the differentlyshapedspinesintheinternalsac (in S. ulcerosus : internalsacwitha rowofapproximately 5–7 distinctlysclerotisedandmoderatelylongspines).
From S. brachati by the absence of a tubercule on abdominal sternite VIII (in S. brachati : small tubercle on sternite VIII), by the broader and stouter ven- tral process of the aedeagus in lateral view, by the presence of sclerotized spinesintheinternalsac.
Fordescriptions, illustrationsanddistributionsofthesespeciesseeAss- INg (2003, 2011), ANLAŞ (2018 b) and Figure 17.
Distributionandbionomics – Thespecieswasfoundattwolocalities fromKonya (Hadim) andKaraman (Ermenek). Thespecimenswerefound understonesandsiftedfromgrassrootsbetweenlimestonegravelonapas-
240 ANLAŞ, S.
bars: 0.5 mm (1–2); 0.2 mm (3–8)
TWO NEW SUNIUS SPECIES FROM ANATOLIA ( COLEOPTERA : STAPHYLINIDAE ) 241
ture with shrubs, at altitudes of 1890 and 1990 m. Some specimens were col- lected with a MSS trap in a rocky steep slope in the subalpine zone.
| NHMO |
Natural History Museum, University of Oslo |
| V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
