Phintella fodingensis Wang, Mi & Peng, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.902.2319 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AB1DF6AF-AD7B-401F-ACD5-A76C3C2E5A4D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10164949 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B41F867-A389-4B0A-94CD-07D12049F770 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B41F867-A389-4B0A-94CD-07D12049F770 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phintella fodingensis Wang, Mi & Peng |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phintella fodingensis Wang, Mi & Peng sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B41F867-A389-4B0A-94CD-07D12049F770
Figs 15–16 View Fig View Fig , 59 View Fig
Diagnosis
The male of Phintella fodingensis sp. nov. resembles that of P. popovi (Prószyński, 1979) , but differs in: (1) the RTA being extended upward in ventral view ( Fig. 15A View Fig ), whereas extended diagonally towards bulb in P. popovi ( Peng 2020: fig. 218b); (2) the embolus being straight ( Fig. 15A View Fig ), whereas curved medially ( Peng 2020: fig. 218b). The female also resembles that of P. popovi , but differs in the copulatory openings, which are separated from each other by about 1.8 times spermathecal width ( Fig. 16A View Fig ), whereas almost touching in P. popovi ( Peng 2020: fig. 218g).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the name of the type locality, Foding Mountain National Nature Reserve; adjective.
Type material
Holotype
CHINA • ♂; Guizhou, Shiqian County, Ganxi Township, Fuyan Village , Jiuchashu ; 27°20.62′ N, 108°3.56′ E; 1410 m a.s.l.; 29 Apr. 2017; X.Q. Mi et al. leg.; TRU-JS 0146 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
CHINA • 3 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; TRU-JS 0147–0151 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 3.88. Carapace 1.69 long, 1.38wide. Abdomen 2.06 long, 1.22 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.43, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.21, AERW 1.28, PERW 1.22, EFL 0.88. Legs: I 5.10 (1.41, 0.75, 1.38, 1.05, 0.51), II 4.47 (1.24, 0.68, 1.13, 0.93, 0.49), III 4.83 (1.34, 0.63, 1.15, 1.22, 0.49), IV 4.99 (1.41, 0.53, 1.25, 1.29, 0.51).
HABITUS. Carapace yellow, covered with white and brown scale-like setae and brown setae, with pale area anteromedially on thorax ( Fig. 16C, F View Fig ). Chelicerae with one retromarginal tooth and two promarginal teeth, without distal flange of fang ( Fig. 16G View Fig ). Legs pale yellow to yellow except femora and tibiae I brown to dark brown. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum pale brown, with a pair of longitudinal, white stripes formed by setae laterally; venter pale gray to pale brown ( Fig. 16C–D View Fig ).
PALP. Tibia almost as long as wide in ventral view; RTA strongly curved medially in ventral view, and tapered to pointed tip curved diagonally towards bulb in retrolateral view; bulb slightly broadened posteriorly, with posterior lobe extended downward; tegular bump lamellar; lamellar process about nine times as long as wide; embolus thin and straight, with rather pointed tip almost directed towards 1 o’clock position in ventral view ( Fig. 15 View Fig ).
Female (paratype, TRU-JS 0147)
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 4.40. Carapace 1.84 long, 1.41 wide. Abdomen 2.50 long, 1.63 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.45, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.21, AERW 1.37, PERW 1.34, EFL 0.94. Legs: I 3.53 (1.10, 0.68, 0.75, 0.66, 0.34), II 3.30 (1.05, 0.55, 0.75, 0.61, 0.34), III 3.82 (1.22, 0.55, 0.78, 0.90, 0.37), IV 4.34 (1.32, 0.58, 1.00, 1.07, 0.37).
HABITUS. Similar to that of male except paler in color and with irregular longitudinal stripe on dorsum of abdomen ( Fig. 16E View Fig ).
EPIGYNE. With bow-shaped basal plate; copulatory openings oval, anteriorly located, separated from each other by 1.8 times spermathecal width; copulatory ducts short, curved as arc-shape and connected to anterior edges of oval spermathecae; fertilization ducts lamellar, extended anterolaterally ( Fig. 16A–B View Fig ).
Distribution
China (Guizhou) ( Fig. 59 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |