Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924

Bland, Keith P., 2019, Name-bearing types of butterflies (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea), in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, Zootaxa 4559 (1), pp. 57-89 : 81

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4559.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FBE1872-5BA7-4E98-8D35-50C09D43F9E9

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5935195

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A85A87DE-DC31-FFA3-25C5-FE09199DF9BF

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924
status

 

Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924 View in CoL ssp. HESSELBARTHI Kudrna 1976

Atalanta 7 (3), 168–171 [169-170]. Combination still valid (see Kudrna, 1977)..

Paratype, 1 male, pinned.

Satyrus HYSIUS Godart , in Latreille & Godart, 1819 [1824]

Encyclopédie Méthodique Histoire Naturelle [Zoologie] 9. Entomologie 329–825 [525]. Current accepted combination: Calisto hysius (Godart, in Latreille & Godart, 1819 [1824]) (see D’Abrera, 1988; Lamas, 2004).

Lectotype, female (no.55) and paralectotype male (no.54), pinned underside uppermost on a strip of cork: Specimen data: Specimen reg. no. 55: “hysius” [Handwritten (by Godart) on coarse bluish paper]. “Dufresne” [Printed] on verso “ Satyrus | hysius | 68” [Handwritten]. “TYPE” [Handwritten on oval pink label]. “Dufresne | 1936-50 | 55” on verso “ Calisto hysius | Godart | TYPE” [Handwritten (by Grimshaw) on mauve paper]. Specimen reg. no. 54: Labels as no. 55 above only without Godart’s handwritten label and with registration no. 54. Remarks: Godart’s handwritten label indicates that specimen no.55 was present in the Dufresne collection when it was studied by Godart. The two form part of the type series. The lectotype was designated by Grimshaw (1897) when he stated that the female was “….the type.” Type locality unknown, but “nous le soupçonnons de l’Amérique septentrionale” [North America]. The species is an endemic of Hispaniola ( Haiti and Dominican Republic). Interestingly although the description was not published until 1824 it must have been written prior to 1818 as that name is used in the collection catalogue of that date (cf. Grimshaw 1897). An invalid “ neotype ” of Satyrus hysius Godart , [1824] was designated by Johnson & Hedges (1998).

Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL ssp. LEIGHEBI Kudrna, 1976 View in CoL

Atalanta 7 (3), 168–171 [168-169]. Current accepted combination: Hipparchia leighebi Kudrna, 1976 View in CoL (see Balletto, Cassulo & Bonelli, 2014).

Paratype, 1 male, pinned.

Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) ssp. WILKINSONI Kudrna, 1977

A revision of the genus HIPPARCHIA Fabricius. E.W. Classey, Faringdon, Oxford. pp.300 [66–68], figures 236 and 237. Junior subjective synonym of Hipparchia semele semele (Linnaeus, 1758) (see Cesaroni et al., 1994). Paratypes, 3 males, 1 female, pinned (genitalia on slides L.1030(♂), L.1031(♂) and L.1032(♀).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

SuperFamily

Papilionoidea

Family

Nymphalidae

SubFamily

Satyrinae

Genus

Hipparchia

Loc

Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924

Bland, Keith P. 2019
2019
Loc

LEIGHEBI

Kudrna 1976
1976
Loc

Hipparchia leighebi

Kudrna 1976
1976
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF