Brevipalpia minima, Zacharda, 1980
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/acarologia/20101980 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A72E0A20-362C-FF9F-FF2D-F927F052FC46 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Brevipalpia minima |
status |
|
Comparison of B. minima View in CoL and H. macrostella
The two species belong to the Rhagidiidae . They are both minute soft-bodied mites which are collected in similar habitats. B. minima is generally longer than H. macrostella , total idiosomal length 338-380 µm vs. 241-309 µm ( Zacharda, 1980; Ducarme et al., 2004b) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE , 2 View FIGURE ). Contrary to many other species ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE ), both mite species have prodorsal trichobothria clavate, but the density of barbules covering the trichobothria is different in the two species. The trichobothrias arise from a sclerite which extends from the naso to the anterior part of the opisthosoma ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE ).
The microsculpture of this sclerite differs between the two species ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE ). Besides, a nodular microstructure is observed on the integument between chelicerae and on the paraxial faces of palps and legs ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE , 4 View FIGURE ), the shape and density of nodules are characteristic of the species.
The other major distinctive characters between B. minima and H. macrostella rely mostly on the unique diversity of forms of the subcapitulum, the chelicerae, the palps, the tarsi I, the rhagidial organs and the leg chaetotaxy as described hereafter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.