Laemostenus (Iranosphodrus) troglophilus Muilwijk, Tahami & Lohaj, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4344.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E87548A3-3CDF-43DA-A5F2-5BE87F8F1910 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6020140 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A71687A9-E44E-FFAC-8480-19AE2F26F924 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Laemostenus (Iranosphodrus) troglophilus Muilwijk, Tahami & Lohaj |
status |
sp. nov. |
Laemostenus (Iranosphodrus) troglophilus Muilwijk, Tahami & Lohaj View in CoL , sp. nov.
( Figs. 23 View FIGURES 22 – 23 , 25 View FIGURES 24 – 25 , 27, 29 View FIGURES 26 – 29 , 31 View FIGURES 30 – 31 )
Type material. Holotype male, labelled: “Iran, Yazd, Tange Chenar, Nafas Cave; 28.viii.2014; leg. M.S. Tahami, H. Entezari, M. Sheykh Rasti, Meshki”/ Laemostenus troglophilus sp. nov. Muilwijk, Tahami & Lohaj; 2016 (red label Holotype). Paratypes: one male and one female, the same data as holotype / Laemostenus troglophilus sp. nov. Muilwijk, Tahami & Lohaj 2016 (red label Paratype). Holotype and one paratype deposited in ZM–CBSU, one paratype in cMU.
Diagnosis. A medium sized, brachypterous Laemostenus sg. Iranosphodrus species. Upper side including legs and antennae dull black, female paratype with bluish shine on elytra. Pronotum and head shiny, with fine microsculpture, elytra matt, with distinct microsculpture ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22 – 23 ).
Description. BL 15.8–16.0 (holotype) mm. Head narrow, parallel-sided, distinctly longer than wide (HL/HW: 1.1), with only posterior pair of supraorbital setae; frontal furrows short, but distinct; eyes flat, reduced (0.5 mm), shorter than temples (1.0 mm). Clypeus with two long setae; labrum with six setae. Antennae in holotype missing, antennae in paratypes rather short, reaching anterior eighth of elytral length, antennomere 3 without accessory pubescence except a few apical setae, antennomeres 4–11 pubescent. Mandibles short.
Pronotum cordiform, distinctly wider than head, as long as wide (PL/ PW: 1.0). Basal impressions short, sparsely punctuated. Lateral bead with superficial punctuation, two antero-lateral setae present, basolateral setae missing. Anterior angles prominent, at apex rounded, posterior angles almost rectangular.
Elytra ovate elongate, relatively broad (EL/EW: 1.6–1.7), with maximum width at apical third; disc with small antero-medial depression; base wider than pronotal base. Humeri moderately rounded, with a small tooth. Striae fine, with punctures, intervals flat. Scutellar striae present; scutellar setiferous punctures situated in striae 1. Umbilicate series consists of 18 setiferous punctures, more interrupted in middle; two setae at apex of stria 7.
Mesosternum with small teeth before mesocoxae, in male paratype reduced. Metepisternum longer than wide ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 24 – 25 ). Abdominal sternites black, with superficial wrinkles and dense microsculpture.
Legs short. Meso- and metatibiae almost straight, not curved, with short ventral brush of setae near apex. Profemori without teeth at ventral sides. Protibiae with sparse, short hairs between cleansing apparatus and apical setae. Tarsi with decumbent pubescence at dorsal sides; claws with small teeth, male protarsi slightly dilated.
Aedeagus: ( Figs. 27, 29 View FIGURES 26 – 29 ) median lobe of aedeagus short (1.93 mm), slightly arcuate, regularly narrowing to the apex in lateral view; dorsal view, apex moderately rounded in dorsal view.
Ovipositor: as on Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30 – 31 .
Differential diagnosis. L. (I.) troglophilus sp. nov. differs from L. yazdensis sp. nov. by the presence of small mesosternal tooth, absence of tooth on profemori, by the shape of pronotum and metepisternum as well as median lobe of aedeagus. Both new species differs from L. (I.) rudichae by straight mesotibiae, more oval elytra, and more short and stout appendages.
Distribution and habitat. So far known only from the twilight zone of the type locality, Nafas cave.
Etymology. The name is taken from the Greek origin, “ trōglo ” means “cave”, and “ philus ” means “liking” or “attracted to”, generally means cave-lover.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |