Fragosa rugosifrons (Schiner, 1868) Miranda & Skevington & Marshall, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4822.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E3B5713F-ADE8-4075-9ABF-8F6DE9D3A88E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4449973 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A51D5F67-FFED-3A6D-FF50-FEF6FDF49B76 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Fragosa rugosifrons |
status |
|
Fragosa rugosifrons View in CoL species group (Fragosa sensu stricto)
Description. Head. Face usually dark dorsal to tubercle; tubercle pointed and medially positioned ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Frons dark. Frons/frontal triangle rugose ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Frontal triangle with white microtrichosity concentrated laterally along eye margin ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 78–88. 78 ). Female ocellar triangle separated by less than its length from posterior eye margin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Occiput microtrichia homogeneously distributed ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Thorax. Scutum dull pale-microtrichose with sub-median pair of weak white microtrichose patches on anterior region, sometimes with weak stripes in place of patches ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Scutellum pale. Post-metacoxal bridge almost complete ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–88. 78 ). Metafemur pale. Wing. Female wing hyaline; female wing bare on basal 1/4 (or almost the whole cell) of cell c, basal 1/3 to 1/2 of br, and baso-anterior margin of bm. Terminalia. Male epandrium enlarged; hypandrium reduced; *surstylus quadrangular with filiform apical extension ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–11 ); *subepandrial sclerite with strongly sclerotized rectangular middle area and wide, but weakly sclerotized, ventrally directed lateral expansions ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 1–11 ); *hypandrium oval ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1–11 ), much smaller than epandrium; postgonite elongated ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 1–11 ).
Included species (11): F. argentina ( Curran, 1939) comb. nov. [1b], F. deceptor ( Curran, 1930a) comb. nov. [1b], F. filiola ( Shannon, 1927) comb. nov. [2], F. harlequina ( Hull, 1948) comb. nov. [1b, 1c], F. hyacinthia ( Hull, 1947a) comb. nov. [2], F. mara ( Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], F. oenone ( Hull, 1949a) comb. nov. [2, type lost], F. provocans ( Curran, 1939) comb. nov. [1b], F. rugosifrons ( Schiner, 1868) , comb. nov. [2, 3, 4], F. stenogaster ( Williston, 1888) comb. nov. [1b], F. zephyrea ( Hull, 1947b) comb. nov. [1b].
Comments. The rugose frons/frontal triangle is a distinct character of this group ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–11 ), but not unique since it occurs in the Pelecinobaccha brevipennis species group as well. Further distinct characters for the F. rugosifrons group include the face that is dark dorsal to tubercle, the pointed and medially positioned facial tubercle ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–11 ), the entirely pale scutellum, the almost complete post-metacoxal bridge ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–88. 78 ), the enlarged epandrium ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1–11 ), and the reduced hypandrium ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1–11 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.