Rhagovelia loriae, Polhemus, 2024

Polhemus, Dan A., 2024, Thirty-four new species of Rhagovelia (Heteroptera: Veliidae) from the East Papua Composite Terrane, far eastern New Guinea, Zootaxa 5400 (1), pp. 1-214 : 127-129

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5400.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B6AC3A4-9187-4336-AAC7-82C3FD046D29

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6859B278-9383-40DB-B749-583CB08E3AD4

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:6859B278-9383-40DB-B749-583CB08E3AD4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rhagovelia loriae
status

n. sp.

Rhagovelia loriae subgroup: R. loriae n. sp., R. guiagoila n. sp., R. basima n. sp. and R. elongata n. sp.

These subgroups are discussed in greater detail within the species treatments following the key, and also noted within the key in those instances where they fall out discretely within the couplet sequence.

Key to wingless forms of the R. papuensis View in CoL group occurring in the EPCT

Key based on females, with supplementary male characters added

1. Female abdominal connexiva with basal segments bearing a dense fringe of thick black setae; central portion of female connexiva either bearing a transverse fold adjacent to abdominal tergites III–V, or with this portion of the connexival margin thinned and glabrous ( Figs. 202 View FIG 202 , 221 View FIGS , 228 View FIGS , 235 View FIGS ); Louisiade Archipelago …......................... R. yela subgroup...2

- Female abdominal connexiva with basal segments lacking a dense fringe of thick black setae; central portion of female connexiva lacking a transverse fold, not thinned or glabrous, although often showing varying degrees of posterior convergence ( Figs. 242 View FIGS , 248 View FIGS , 254 View FIGS , 261 View FIGS , 268 View FIGS , 275 View FIGS , 282, 283 View FIGS , 291 View FIGS ); Papuan Peninsula and proximal islands exclusive of the Louisiade Archipelago ( Figs. 266 View FIG , 295 View FIG )........................................................................................... 4

2. Female abdominal connexiva with a strong transverse fold adjacent to tergite III or IV ( Figs. 202 View FIG 202 , 221 View FIGS , 228 View FIGS ); female abdomen with ventrite II not tumescent, ventrites II–IV lacking patches of posteriorly-directed gold setae centrally, ventrite III not transversely depressed; Rossel or Tagula islands ( Fig. 240 View FIG ).................................................... 3

- Female female connexiva lacking a transverse fold adjacent to abdominal tergites III–V, but with this portion of the connexival margin thinned, glabrous and black ( Fig. 235 View FIGS ); female abdomen with ventrite II tumescent, ventrites II–IV bearing posteriorly-directed patches of golden setae posteromedially, ventrite III transversely depressed; Misima Island ( Fig. 240 View FIG ).............................................................................................. R. bwagabwaga n. sp.

3. Female abdomen strongly folded and foreshortened posteriorly, posterior half of abdomen angled upward into a vertical orientation ( Fig. 202 View FIG 202 , 221 View FIGS ); male proctiger with basolateral lobes weakly developed, small and rounded, distolateral lobes barely developed, parallel-sided ( Fig. 225 View FIGS ); Rossel Island ( Fig. 240 View FIG )..................................... R. yela n. sp.

- Female connexival margins with a strong transverse fold centrally adjacent to abdominal tergite V ( Fig. 228 View FIGS ), posterior half of abdomen folded upward at a 45° angle; male proctiger with basolateral lobes well-developed, angular, distolateral lobes moderately developed, rounded ( Fig. 232 View FIGS ); Tagula Island ( Fig. 240 View FIG ).................................. R. tagula n. sp.

4. Posterolateral angles of female connexiva bearing prominent, curving, sickle-shaped tufts of posteriorly-directed setae ( Fig. 261 View FIGS ); female connexial margins tightly appressed posteriorly, entirely covering abdominal tergites V–VII ( Fig. 261 View FIGS ); male proctiger with distolateral lobes produced into apically-directed, angular processes ( Fig. 265 View FIGS ); southeastern New Guinea ( Fig. 266 View FIG )................................................................................... R. ivimkana n. sp.

- Posterolateral angles of female connexiva without prominent, curving, sickle-shaped tufts of posteriorly-directed setae, at most bearing brushy patches of setae; female connexial margins not appressed posteriorly, if touching then doing so only at posterior apices, leaving abdominal tergites V–VII visible to some degree ( Figs. 242 View FIGS , 248 View FIGS , 254 View FIGS , 268 View FIGS , 275 View FIGS , 282, 283 View FIGS , 291 View FIGS ); male proctiger with distolateral lobes broadly rounded ( Figs. 246 View FIGS , 252 View FIGS , 258 View FIGS , 272 View FIGS , 279 View FIGS , 288 View FIGS , 294 View FIGS )................................... 5

5. Female connexival margins touching postriorly at posterolateral angles, meeting over the top of abdominal tergite VII and covering most of this tergite in dorsal view ( Fig. 242 View FIGS ).......................................... R. priori Lansbury View in CoL

- Female connexival margins widely separated, not touching posteriorly, abdominal tergite VII largely visible when viewed dorsally............................................................................................. 6

6. Female connexiva with margins not thinned and glabrous adjacent to abdominal tergites III and IV, of similar width and setiferation to margins adjacent to abdominal tergites I and II ( Figs. 254 View FIGS , 260 View FIGS ); female abdomen with ventrites II and III not tumescent, lacking posteriorly-directed patches of golden setae posteromedially, ventrite IV not centrally depressed or transversely sulcate ( Figs. 209, 211 View FIGS ); male body with ratio of body length to body maximum width less than 3.0; male hind tibia usually straight or gently bowed ( Fig. 256 View FIGS ); rarely strongly sinuate.............................................. 7

- Female connexiva with margins thinned, and glabrous adjacent to abdominal tergites III and IV, clearly lacking the setiferation present on preceding basal connexival segments, often bowed inward and concave ( Figs. 216–219 View FIGS , 268 View FIGS , 275 View FIGS , 282, 283 View FIGS , 291 View FIGS ); female abdomen with ventrites II and III tumescent, bearing posteriorly-directed patches of golden setae posteromedially, with such setal patches also sometimes present on ventrite IV, ventrite IV either centrally depressed or transversely sulcate ( Figs. 203–206 View FIGS ); male body slender and elongate, with ratio of body length to body maximum width 3.0 or greater, male hind tibia strongly sinuate in fully developed males ( Figs. 270 View FIGS , 277 View FIGS , 286 View FIGS , 292 View FIGS )............................ R. loriae subgroup…8

7. Prosternum without small black denticles adjacent to rostrum; posterolateral angles of female connexiva with prominent tufts of long setae, these tufts acuminate when viewed laterally, inwardly curving when viewed dorsally ( Fig. 254 View FIGS ); male with disal cone of proctiger longer than distolateral lobes ( Fig. 258 View FIGS ), male paramere with dorsal margin bearing a broad, V-shaped indentation ( Fig. 257 View FIGS ); Woodlark Island ( Fig. 240 View FIG )................................................ R. suloga n. sp.

- Prosternum bearing small black denticles adjacent to rostrum; posterolateral angles of female connexiva lacking prominent tufts of long setae ( Fig. 248 View FIGS ); male with disal cone of proctiger subequal in length to distolateral lobes ( Fig. 252 View FIGS ), male paramere with dorsal margin broadly concave ( Fig. 251 View FIGS ); northern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 266 View FIG ).................... R. dinga n. sp.

8. Female abdominal tergite VII narrowing posteriorly between convergent connexiva, with anterior width over 1.5X or more the posterior width ( Figs. 268 View FIGS , 282, 283 View FIGS )..................................................................... 9

- Female abdominal tergite VII with sides more parallel, with only slight posterior narrowing; anterior width less than 1.4X the posterior width ( Figs. 275 View FIGS , 291 View FIGS )......................................................................... 10

9. Female connexival margins convergent posteriorly adjacent to abdominal tergites V–VIII ( Fig 218 View FIGS , 282, 283 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergite VII narrow, with length exceeding 2.5X the posterior width; male proctiger relatively elongate, with basolateral and distolateral lobes projecting laterally to nearly the same extent ( Fig. 272 View FIGS , 279 View FIGS , 288 View FIGS , 294 View FIGS ); female ventral abdomen with posteromedial golden setal patches present on ventrites II–IV, small, transverse depressions present anteromedially on both ventrites IV and V ( Fig 205 View FIGS ); Fergusson and Normanby islands ( Fig. 295 View FIG )........................... .. R. basima n. sp.

- Female connexival margins bowed gently outward then weakly convergent adjacent to abdominal tergites V–VIII ( Figs. 216 View FIGS , 268 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergite VII broader than above, with length less than 2.0X the posterior width; male proctiger more compact, with basolateral lobes projecting laterally well beyond distolateral lobes ( Fig. 272 View FIGS ); female ventral abdomen with posteromedial golden setal patches present on abdominal ventrites II and III, with a few gold hairs also present posteromedially on ventrite IV, ventrite IV bearing a glabrous transverse sulcus anteromedially, ventrite V lacking such a depression, but flattened centrally as seen in oblique or posterior view ( Fig 203 View FIGS ); southern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 295 View FIG )..... .. R. loriae n. sp.

10. Body length less than 3.5 mm in both males and females; female connexiva parallel adjacent to abdominal tergites V–VIII ( Fig. 217 View FIGS , 275 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergites III and IV gently raised across their entire widths, not depressed laterally and tumid medially; female ventral abdomen with posteromedial golden setal patches present on abdominal ventrites II and III, with a few gold hairs also present posteromedially on ventrite IV, abdominal ventrite IV with shallow glabrous transverse sulcus anteromedially, ventrite V lacking such a depression but flattened centrally as seen in oblique or posterior view ( Fig 204 View FIGS ); male proctiger with distolateral lobes relatively short, length of distal cone subequal to that of distolateral lobes ( Fig. 279 View FIGS ); Sideia and Basilaki Islands ( Fig. 295 View FIG )............................................................. R. guiagoila n. sp.

- Body length exceeding 3.8 mm in both males and females; female abdominal tergites III and IV compressed medially, depressed and concave laterally adjacent to inwardly bowed connexival margins; female connexiva bowed gently outward adjacent to abdominal tergites V–VIII ( Fig. 219 View FIGS ); female ventral abdomen with posteromedial golden setal patches present on ventrites II–III, but not on ventrite IV, ventrite IV with a small, transverse depression anteromedially, ventrite V lacking a depression but slightly flattened centrally as seen in oblique or posterior view ( Fig 206 View FIGS ); male proctiger longer than above, distolateral lobes well developed and broadly rounded, with length of distal cone distinctly less than that of distolateral lobes ( Fig. 294 View FIGS ); Goodenough Island ( Fig. 295 View FIG )............................................................... R. elongata n. sp.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Veliidae

Genus

Rhagovelia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Veliidae

Genus

Rhagovelia

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF