Eudistoma repens Millar 1977
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4114.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6EA59057-0E05-4AA5-8B84-327CBDB32E5B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6068888 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A25D4D00-D640-7629-7BF3-FF6D7CFCFC21 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eudistoma repens Millar 1977 |
status |
|
Figure 8 View FIGURE 8 .
Stations. SS1; SS3; SS4; SS10; SS12; SC13; SD8; CP4386; CP4408.
The colonies are large with many short cylindrical lobes erect on a thick basal crust ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 A). The tunic is entirely incrusted with sand. The oral siphons are slightly protruding from the flat upper colony surface ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 B) The zooids are all contracted ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 E) with 5mm in total length and lie at the top of the colony lobes. Both siphons have 6 pointed lobes ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 F). The thoracic wall is thick and opaque. The numerous oral tentacles in 2 orders of size are placed on 2 rings. In the branchial sac the first row of stigmata curves dorsally 20 stigmata were counted in the second row on the right side. The round stomach is followed by an annular widening. The rectum begins with a caecum and then forms a deep curve perhaps a result of contraction. An average of 20 testis vesicles occupies the gut loop. Two or 3 larvae are enclosed into the atrial cavity. Their trunk is 0.65mm long with a tail in a half turn ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 C). Lateral to the 3 medial adhesive papillae 8 to 10 bifid ampullae make a thick coating. The above description corresponds to that of Millar (1977).
E. repens and E. carolinense were found together in several dives and even sometimes fixed on each other. The difference between them is difficult to see at first sight when the colony lobes are small. In E. repens the top surface of the lobes appears granular due to the protrusion of the siphons; the tunic is softer and the zooids have a strong longitudinal musculature. The size of the larva is very different in both species.
Rocha & Moreno (2000) recorded colonies of E. carolinense from Brazil but without description. Oliveira et al (2014) considered E. repens as a synonym of E. carolinense for Brasilian specimens but their description mentions an opaque and muscular body wall, several oocytes in the atrial cavity (characters of the former species) but larvae only 0.4mm in length (the size in E. carolinense ). They also represent different colony shapes ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 ). These colonies likely belong to a mixture of two species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Tunicata |
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |