Apodemus alpicola Heinrich 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11334372 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A253CD68-16C4-B356-A35A-AD8EC765991B |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Apodemus alpicola Heinrich 1952 |
status |
|
Apodemus alpicola Heinrich 1952 View in CoL
Apodemus alpicola Heinrich 1952 View in CoL , J. Mammal., 33: 260.
Type Locality: Allgäu, Osterachtal, S Germany.
Vernacular Names: Alpine Field Mouse.
Synonyms: Apodemus alpinus Heinrich 1951 .
Distribution: Endemic to NW parts of the Alps: S Germany, Austria ( Bauer and Spitzenberger, 1996; Spitzenberger and Englisch, 1996), Liechtenstein, Switzerland ( Hausser, 1995; Margry, 1996; Maurizio, 1994), N Italy ( Amori et al., 1999), and SE France; altitudinal range 550-2000 m ( Mitchell-Jones et al., 1999).
Conservation: IUCN – Data Deficient.
Discussion: Sylvaemus group. Originally described as a high-altitude form of A. flavicollis , but recognized as distinct by Storch and Lütt (1989), who reviewed morphology and distribution of S. alpicola and noted that it occurred syntopically with A. sylvaticus and A. flavicollis . The specific integrity of S. alpicola has been confirmed by allozymic and gene sequence studies ( Filippucci, 1992; Filippucci et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2004; Michaux et al., 2002 a; Reutter et al., 2003; Serizawa et al., 2000; Suzuki et al., 2003; Vogel et al., 1991). Filippucci’s (1992) report of allozymic variation at 28-33 loci suggested that A. alpicola may be most closely related to A. uralensis , which occurs from E Europe to NW China (similar results are reported for Turkish samples by Filippucci et al., 1996), and that A. uralensis , A. flavicollis , A. alpicola , and A. hermonensis (= A. witherbyi ) separated recently from a common ancestor. The sister-species relationship between A. alpicola and A. uralensis was corroborated by Michaux et al.’ s (2002 a) phylogenetic analyses of the mtDNA cytochrome b and 12S rRNA sequences, and Reutter et al.’s (2003) analyses of cytochrome b haplotype divergences, but not by complete mtDNA cytochrome b sequences ( Liu et al., 2004). A discriminant function analysis of cranial and dental measurements for distinguishing samples of A. sylvaticus , A. flavicollis , and A. alpicola provided by Reutter et al. (1999), who also documented variation in banded chromosomes between A. alpicola and A. uralensis ( Reutter et al., 2001) . Michaux et al. (2001 a) and Reutter et al. (2002) described a relatively simple process where species-specific primers derived from mtDNA cytochrome b sequences can be used to rapidly identify specimens of A. alpicola , A. flavicollis , and A. sylvaticus in regions of sympatry or syntopy. Included in Mezhzherin’s (1997 a) review of N Eurasian Apodemus , and also reviewed by Mitchell-Jones et al. (1999). Musser et al. (1996) listed specimens and discussed subgeneric allocation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.