Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/579 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A21187CB-FF88-FF96-466D-FA4E2A09FB13 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986 |
status |
|
Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986
( Figures 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7 )
* 1986 Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor , p. 555, figs. 1-22.
v. 2013 Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor ; Wang, Blanchard, and Dilcher, p. 15, fig. 12.
Description. Flowers ca 3–4 mm long and 2–4 mm wide (excluding filaments and pedicel) with up to 10 stamens. Filaments exserted, up to 5 mm long and often of unequal length. Anthers ca 0.75–1 mm long and 0.5 mm wide. Perianth parts usually three, triangular, ca 2 mm long, and 1 mm wide, attached to the rim of the receptacle. Receptacle ca 2 mm wide and 1 mm long. Pedicel ca 0.3 mm wide and up to 6 mm long.
Number of specimens examined. 4. UF15737- 026430, 027593, 060709.
Remarks. Flowers of Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986 are common from the Warman, Puryear and Buchanan localities of the Claiborne Group in Tennessee ( Crepet, 1979; Crepet and Taylor, 1985, 1986; Wang et al., 2013). Compared with flowers from other Claiborne localities, specimens from the Bovay locality are better preserved and they are probably more mature than those described from the Warman locality. One complete flower ( Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 ) has 10 stamens, five of which have shorter filaments that are only 67% of the length of the other five stamens.
Berry (1916b, p. 322, plate 96, figures 1-5) described a similar flower from a locality 2.4 km west of Grand Junction in Fayette County, Tennessee. He suggested that this specimen, assigned to Combretanthites eocenica , is closely related to the Combretaceae rather than the Mimosoideae because of its inferior ovary. If, however, the ovary is superior within a hypanthium, Berry’s specimen could belong in Protomimosoidea . Crepet and Taylor (1986) did not include Berry’s specimen in their study of primitive mimosoid flowers. Unfortunately, we are unable to locate the specimen described by
BLANCHARD, WANG, & DILCHER: FOSSIL PLANTS FROM MISSISSIPPI
Berry (1916b) to further confirm or reject its assignment to the Combretaceae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.