Empidideicus (Anomaloptilus) rinhai Evenhuis & Gharali, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5222.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F4983B58-7301-4A3F-AC08-3E5120450EA1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7471800 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A1541B07-260E-FFB5-FF60-FC451A06F8CE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Empidideicus (Anomaloptilus) rinhai Evenhuis & Gharali |
status |
sp. nov. |
Empidideicus (Anomaloptilus) rinhai Evenhuis & Gharali , n. sp.
( Figs 15, 16 View FIGURES 11–16 , 19 View FIGURES 17–19 , 38, 39 View FIGURES 34–39 , 47 View FIGURES 40–47 , 61, 62 View FIGURES 59–62 , 77 View FIGURES 77 )
Types. Holotype ♂ and GoogleMaps 1♂, 1♀ paratypes from MADAGASCAR: Tulear Province : Zombitse National Park , near ANGAP Office , 840 m, 18–23 Dec 2002, M.E. Irwin, F. Parker & R. Harin’Hala , Malaise in deciduous spiny forest ( CASLOT 024735 ). GoogleMaps Other paratypes: MADAGASCAR: 2♂, Tulear Province: Cape Ste. Marie Special Reserve, 25°35.26′S, 45°09.78′E, 37 m, 9–15 Dec 2002, M. Irwin, F. Parker, R. Harin’Hala, Malaise in spiny bush ( CASLOT 024734 ); GoogleMaps 1♂, same data except 30 Apr–11 May 2003 ( CASLOT 024746 ) GoogleMaps . Holotype in CAS, paratypes in CAS and BPBM .
Diagnosis. Most similar to E. (A.) hauseri n. sp. based on having yellow marks in the prescutellar area. It is eastly separated from it based on size (E. (A.) rinhai n. sp. is ca. 1 mm long; whereas E. (A.) hauseri n. sp. is twice that). It is also separated by the lack of coalesced yellow color in the prescutellar area (broadly yellow in E. (A.) hauseri n. sp.) and the open anal cell in the wing (anal cell closed in E. (A.) hauseri n. sp.).
Description
Male ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 11–16 ). Length: 1.20–1.30 mm. Wing: 1.00– 1.40 mm. Head ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17–19 ): longer than high; eyes dichoptic, separated at vertex by 1.7× distance between lateral ocelli, tapering to narrow face, width about equal to 3 ommatidia; occiput and postgena black; front slightly depressed medially, white; face gray; antennae (cf. Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–24 ) with scape and pedicel yellow, flagellomeres dark brown; scape short, subtrapezoidal; pedicel subconical, wider than long; first flagellomere lanceolate, length 3.5× width; second flagellomere one-half length of first flagellomere, with minute transparent apical style; mentum white; clypeus brown, length one-half of oral margin length; proboscis brown, slightly longer than head length; labrum sclerotized, stiff, pointed apically, length subequal to clypeus, yellow basally, brown apically; palpus not evident.
Thorax ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 34–39 ). Mesonotum matte black, with white markings in following areas: thin admedian longitudinal vittae not reaching scutellum, leaving two small white marks in prescutellar area and thin connection to vittae; dorsolaterally from humeral callus to postalar callus and two large interhumeral marks; scutellum white, dark brown below along posterior margin; pleura brown with white color on following: posterior half of anepisternum and anepimeron, upper half of meron; upper margin of katepisternum; propleuron white; halter and knob white.
Leg. Coxae yellow, brown basally, mid and hind coxae with much more brown than fore coxa; femora and tibiae yellow with some brown basally; tarsi 3–5 pale brown, remainder of leg white.
Wing ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 40–47 ). Elongate, length 2.7× width; hyaline; veins brown; costa ends just beyond end of R 4+5; vein Sc incomplete; Rs evanescent at connection with R 1; R 4+5 slightly bowed; vein M 1 curved to wing margin; M 2 very slightly curved to wing margin; cell dm closed by apical crossvein; crossvein subequal in width to crossvein r-m; A 1 effaced, straight to wing margin; anal cell narrowly open at wing margin; fringe of hair on posterior margin of wing well shortest at wing tip becoming longer and more sparse toward base.
Abdomen ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 59–62 ). Tergites dark brown to black, narrowly white along posterior margin of tergites and laterally; tergites II and III with pale brown spots dorsolaterally; tergites with sparsely scattered minute brown hairs; sternites white.
Genitalia ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 77 ). Epandrium in lateral view subquadrate with long thin dorsoventral process, process well sclerotized and slightly clubbed apically ( Fig. 77A View FIGURES 77 ), apex with microscopic hairs ( Fig. 77D View FIGURES 77 ); gonocoxa in lateral view conical, tapering to apex; in ventral view with basal sclerotize band and large seta medially on each lobe ( Fig. 77A View FIGURES 77 ); gonostylus subtrapezoidal with rounded medial process, apex of medial process with microscopic hairs ( Fig. 77E View FIGURES 77 ); lateral arms of parameral sheath large, flared apically, not as long as aedeagal apodeme; aedeagal apodeme peanut-shaped, truncate ventrally, with foliate lateral rami; aedeagal bulb large, in dorsal view truncate apically; distal portion of parameral sheath cylindrical with subapical collar-like sheath over aedeagus ( Fig. 77C View FIGURES 77 ).
Female: As in male except as follows: Mesonotum ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 34–39 ) with admedian vittae more pronounced and complete from interhumeral marks to prescutellar marks, in some specimens somewhat coalesced in prescutellar area with orangish color; scutellum all white. Abdomen ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 59–62 ) with brown and yellow to yellowish white pattern; tergite I with anterior brown band complete; tergites II–V with brown band restricted to medial area brown becoming narrower on succeeding segments, tergites II–V with brown dorsolateral spots in yellowish white area. Sternites white. Genitalia not dissected.
Etymology. Named for Rasolandalao Harin’Hala Hasinjaka (“Rin’ha”) who helped collected the type and was instrumental in collecting thousands and thousands of microbombyliids from Madagascar as part of National Science Foundation-funded the “Terrestrial arthropod inventory of Madagascar ”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |