Periscelis (Myodris) annulata ( Fallen , 1813)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/alpento.6.85391 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:492F060D-6C48-4F1B-B5A8-FE57EF43E4FC |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A0E4808C-62F2-5B4D-B0B1-09DF3AAB8DFF |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Periscelis (Myodris) annulata ( Fallen , 1813) |
status |
|
Periscelis (Myodris) annulata ( Fallen, 1813)
Figs 5 View Figures 4–10 , 9 View Figures 4–10 , 17-22 View Figures 17–22 , 27-30 View Figures 23–34 , 36 View Figures 35–36
Redescription of male genitalia.
Epandrium (Figs 17 View Figures 17–22 , 20 View Figures 17–22 , 22 View Figures 17–22 ) small, shortly arch-shaped, distinctly higher than long (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ) but almost as broad as high (Fig. 22 View Figures 17–22 ), with large (although slightly narrower than that of P. (M.) haennii ) anal opening. Setae on epandrium relatively long but subequal in length and distributed only in posterior marginal area surrounding anal opening. Surstylus (Fig. 21 View Figures 17–22 ) long, proximally broad but relatively suddenly (see somewhat angular anterobasal part) distally tapered. This slender distal part of surstylus slightly bent, provided with a row of fine setulae at anterior margin (Fig. 21 View Figures 17–22 ) and with relatively acute apex. Cerci free and inserted below anal opening as in relatives. Each cercus slender and elongate but shorter than height of anal opening (see Figs 20 View Figures 17–22 , 22 View Figures 17–22 ), tapered distally, with apex slightly bent anteriorly (Fig. 18 View Figures 17–22 ) and provided with a pair of distinctly separate short anteroapical spines; posterior and posterolateral sides of cercus with some micropubescence and a row of long setae, the apical and (often) also subapical which are longer than others (see Fig. 18 View Figures 17–22 ). True gonostylus lost; medandrium (see Fig. 20 View Figures 17–22 , ma) extremely reduced, forming a small transverse sclerite attached to posterior part of hypandrium. Hypandrium (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ) frame-shaped and relatively well separated from (dorsally attached) phallapodeme as characteristic for all Myodris species, without any trace of pregonites. Aedeagal complex very large, composed of large pocket-shaped phallapodeme, very long and slender submembranous aedeagus and distinctly sclerotized paired postgonites. Phallapodeme (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ) formed as in P. (M.) haennii , thus pocket-shaped and compact (= without separate basal part). Aedeagus (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ) also very similar (both in form and length, and formed only by distiphallus) to that of the latter species but its membranous apex rather spindle-shaped. Postgonite (Fig. 19 View Figures 17–22 ) relatively large and distally slender, slightly longer than surstylus (cf. Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ), with basal part short and broad, with distal slender part gradually tapered, straight and somewhat shorter than that of P. (M.) haennii having acute apex and a row of setulae at posterior margin. Ejacapodeme (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–22 ) robust but relatively simple, basally hardly wider than distally, shorter and less elongate (about 4.5 times as long as its maximum width) than that of P. (M.) haennii .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |