Aegidinus cornutus Colby, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606953 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09AA5C86-5138-42A7-9646-9FF2A7F46767 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3680492 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F138799-E546-B07D-9BCC-5F44D39AF97D |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Aegidinus cornutus Colby, 2009 |
status |
|
Aegidinus cornutus Colby, 2009
( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (a–f))
Aegidinus cornutus Colby, 2009: 18
= Aegidinus unicus Colby, 2009: 37 , syn. nov.
Type locality. Brazil, Mato Grosso, Sinop.
Type material examined
Aegidinus cornutus : Holotype. Male at CMN labelled ‘SINOP 12°31ʹ S, 55°37ʹ W BR 163 km 500 a 600 Mato Grosso, BRASIL 350 m IX.1974 Alvarenga & Roppa col./Coleção M. Alvarenga/H. & A. HOWDEN COLLECTION ex. A. Martinez coll./ Aegidinus cornutus Colby HOLOTYPE ’.
Paratype. Male at CMN labelled ‘Oct. 976 BRASIL Minas Gerais Sinópolis Alvarenga – leg. Coll. Martinez /H. & A. HOWDEN COLLECTION ex. A. Martinez coll./ Aegidinus cornutus Colby PARATYPE ’.
Additional material examined
BRAZIL. Mato Grosso: Sinop, 12°31ʹ S, 55°37ʹ W, BR 163 km 500–600, 350 m, September 1974, Alvarenga, Roppa leg., two males and one female ( CEMT). Pará: Redençao, Pinkaiti – Aik , October 1999, P.Y. Scheffler leg., 18 males and nine females ( CEMT); Redençao, Pinkaiti – Aik , FIT, 2 November 1998, P.Y. Scheffler leg., one male ( CEMT).
Diagnosis
Aegidinus cornutus can be easily distinguished by the parameres not separated into dorsomedial and ventrolateral lobes ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (c – e)). External female genitalia as in Figure 6 View Figure 6 (f).
Remarks
Aegidinus cornutus and Ae. unicus were both described from Sinop, Mato Grosso, Brazil, from a male and a female, respectively. Additional specimens of both sexes with the same locality labels as the holotype and a rather long series of both sexes from Redençao ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (a,b)) show that the the two names belong to the same species. Therefore, a new synonymy is here proposed.
The label of the paratype of Ae. cornutus is wrong. There is no locality ‘ Sinópolis ’ in Minas Gerais, and Sinop has been probably misinterpreted as an abbreviation; if in the original data the state was noted as MGr or MG, it could be confused with Minas Gerais (instead of Mato Grosso). M. Alvarenga went to Sinop (Mato Grosso), then a just founded town, more than once in the 1970s and he was proud of his extensive collecting done there (personal comments to FZVM on several occasions, 1992 – 2008).
CMN |
Canadian Museum of Nature |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Orphninae |
Genus |
Aegidinus cornutus Colby, 2009
Frolov, Andrey V., Akhmetova, Lilia A. & Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z. 2019 |
Aegidinus cornutus
Colby 2009: 18 |
Aegidinus unicus
Colby 2009: 37 |