Neoaraneomyces W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han, J.D. Liang & Z.Q. Liang, 2022
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.91.86812 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A86501A-8F6C-59C1-A432-474489DCAE86 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Neoaraneomyces W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han, J.D. Liang & Z.Q. Liang |
status |
gen. nov. |
Neoaraneomyces W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han, J.D. Liang & Z.Q. Liang gen. nov.
Etymology.
Referring to a new genus parasitic on spiders
Type species.
Neoaraneomyces araneicola W.H. Chen, Y.F. Han, J.D. Liang & Z.Q. Liang.
Description.
Colonies on PDA, white to grey, reverse yellowish. Conidiophores mononematous, usually arising from aerial hyphae, phialides solitary or in groups of two to three. Phialides emerging laterally from hyphae, forming a compact hymenium, abruptly narrowing into a neck. Conidia in chains, one-celled, hyaline, fusiform or ellipsoidal.
Host.
Spider ( Araneidae )
Habitat.
Near roads and located on or under rocks.
Sexual morph.
Unknown.
Notes.
The genera Akanthomyces , Beauveria , Clonostachys , Cordyceps , Engyodontium de Hoog, Gibellula , Hevansia , Hirsutella , Hymenostilbe , Lecanicillium W. Gams & Zare, Ophiocordyceps Petch, Purpureocillium , and Torrubiella Boud. have been reported as spider-pathogenic fungi in Hypocreales ( Shrestha et al. 2019). Gibellula is only found on spiders. Neoaraneomyces differs from Gibellua by its paecilomyces-like conidiogenous structures, phialides which were solitary or in groups of two to four, with fusiform to ellipsoidal conidia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |