Demoulinia crassi, : Gillies, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4820.3.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:560370FE-B271-48D2-A720-DB9034CE308E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4434466 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/960C8792-1601-753E-56E3-FF62B43FBF39 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Demoulinia crassi |
status |
|
Differences between D. crassi View in CoL and D. insularis (= D. assimilis)
Denticles on claw. According to the original descriptions of the Madagascar species D. insularis and D. assimilis , they both differ from D. crassi by edentate claws, while claws of D. crassi have small denticles ( Figs 35–37 View FIGURES 32–38 ). More careful examination of the holotype of D. insularis , done by Luke Jacobus, and the type series of D. assimilis , done by Jean-Luc Gattolliat, reveals that claws of these larvae have vestigial denticles ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 32–38 ), which are much smaller than denticles of D. crassi .
Denticles on paraproct. The paraproct of D. crassi is caudally stretched into a narrowed projection, so that the median margin of the distal part of the paraproct has a shallow concavity; marginal denticles located on the caudal projection of paraproct, are turned medially ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 39–44 ); in contrast to this, in D. insularis (= D. assimilis ) the paraproct has a more usual structure, with the median margin entirely convex and all marginal denticles directed caudally ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 39–44 ; Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty 1998: fig. 10; Gattolliat 2003: fig. 10). Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty (1998), distin-guished D. insularis from D. crassi «by ... numerous small spines of the paraproct», but did not report the source of information about the paraproct structure of D. crassi . Actually, spines (denticles) on the paraproct of D. crassi are also numerous and small, but differently directed ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 39–44 ).
Shape of tergalii. Tergalii of D. crassi are so greatly widened that tergalii III–V have their anal lobes projected proximad of the base ( Figs 47–49 View FIGURES 45–51 ), while tergalii of D. insularis are less widened ( Gattolliat 2003: fig. 12).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |