Xestomyzini Lyneborg, 1976
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.053.0111 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/956BD905-FFED-C90B-FE61-FBD1FE2AF948 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Xestomyzini Lyneborg, 1976 |
status |
|
Subfamily Xestomyzini Lyneborg, 1976
The subfamily Xestomyzinae is morphologically very well supported ( Lyneborg 1972). One of the most obvious external characters in females is the set of thick macrosetae on sternite 8, that are utilized for digging during oviposition, just as acanthophorite spines are utilized by Agapophytinae and Therevinae . Other characters include: spermathecal duct possessing a sclerotised ring basally; presence of lateral sclerites of the distiphallus ( Hauser & Irwin 2005 a); dorsal aedeagal apodeme reduced; spermathecal ducts entering the dorsal wall of the bursa copulatrix independently; and sternite 10 being rounded posteriorly with a long anterior extension.
There is a clear taxonomic distinction between the New World genus Henicomyia Coquillett and the Old World genera of Xestomyzinae . Henicomyia has setulae on vein R 1, while all other Xestomyzinae lack these setulae. Lyneborg (1972) stated that the genera Xestomyza Wiedemann, Braunsophila Kröber and Ceratosathe Lyneborg form a monophyletic group, these being characterised by: proboscis longer than head; broad gena; frons possessing numerous setae; and more than three pairs of dorsocentral macrosetae. The relationship between this informal group and the other genera of Xestomyzinae remains unclear.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |