Echiniscus aff. brunus, Dey & Gąsiorek & Michalczyk, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad132 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FB8839E-9C7D-4B5D-A35C-BED4249BAF77C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10470623 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9323FE1E-FF90-D305-FC75-411BFE77F933 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Echiniscus aff. brunus |
status |
|
Echiniscus aff. brunus sp. can. 1
( Figs 12 View Figure 12 , 13 View Figure 13 ) Material examined: Eight individuals (for details, see Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Shortened description: Morphotype almost identical to that of E. brunus , except for the presence of the same type of circular cuticular pores with thick borders on all parts of the dorsal and pedal plates in E. aff. brunus sp. can. 1 ( Figs 12B, D View Figure 12 and 13C–D View Figure 13 ) vs. pores on dorsal and pedal plates different in E. brunus sp. nov. ( Figs 10B, D View Figure 10 and 11C, D View Figure 11 ). Molecular phylogenetic analysis suggests it is a closely related sister, potentially cryptic or pseudocryptic, species to E. brunus (see Fig. 2 View Figure 2 and genetic distances in the description of E. brunus above).
DNA sequences: A set of five markers was obtained: 18S rRNA (OR520118–9), 28S rRNA (OR520112–3), ITS-1 (OR520104–7), ITS-2 (OR520125–8) and COI (OR506704– 7). Uncorrected pairwise distances to E. brunus can be found in the description of the new species above, whereas genetic p-distances to E. aff. brunus sp. can. 2 are as follows: 18S rRNA, 0.0%; 28S rRNA, 0.4%; ITS-1, 5.1%; ITS-2, 3.7%; and COI, 3.6% (see also Supporting Information, SM.03).
Remarks: Foundwith Echiniscus cf. scabrospinosus , Pseudechiniscus sp. , Milnesium sp. , Dianea sp. , Ramazzottius sp., Diphascon sp. , Minibiotus sp. and Macrobiotus sp. in the sample. Compare Figures 10D View Figure 10 , 11D View Figure 11 with Figures 12D View Figure 12 , 13D View Figure 13 for a potential difference in the shape of pedal plate pores between E. brunus and Echiniscus aff. brunus sp. can. 1.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |