Doto chica Marcus & Marcus, 1960
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11606/1807-0205/2022.62.063 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7618262 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/922D9668-FFF8-881F-FCD8-B02AA73A6DCF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Doto chica Marcus & Marcus, 1960 |
status |
|
33. Doto chica Marcus & Marcus, 1960 View in CoL ( Fig. 4C View Figure 4 )
Material examined: Praia de Baia Formosa, Baia Formosa, 03.I.2011, three specimens, 5-6 mm (body length), leg. M. Delgado ( GEEFAA 315).
Description: Body flat and elongated, whitish with light brown spots over the entire body and also white, spots. Ceratae creamish, with light pink tubercles and blue spots. Rhinophores dark brown with minute, whitish spots. Head well developed, with small eyes, elongated oral tentacles, one pair of retractile rhinophores with basal projection. Medially, with anal and genital pores elevated. Two rows of longitudinal ceratae with globose tubercles. Posteriorly, smooth foot elongated forming a prominent tail.
Geographic distribution: Western Atlantic: Bahamas, Costa Rica, Cuba, CuraÇao, Mexico, Panama, Puerto Rico, USA, Venezuela, Brazil (Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte – present study, São Paulo) (Ev.Marcus & Er. Marcus,1960; Valdés et al., 2006; García et al., 2008; Galvão-Filho et al., 2015).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |