Hauptenia beibengensis Sui & Chen, 2023

Sui, Yong-Jin, Yang, Lin, Long, Jian-Kun, Chang, Zhi-Min & Chen, Xiang-Sheng, 2023, Review of the genus Hauptenia Szwedo (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Derbidae), with descriptions of two new species from China, ZooKeys 1157, pp. 95-108 : 95

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1157.97646

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ACCD12F3-ED40-4CED-847B-21B01CB7D11B

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/43354BDE-7248-4623-9A54-0D671318F12D

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:43354BDE-7248-4623-9A54-0D671318F12D

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Hauptenia beibengensis Sui & Chen
status

sp. nov.

Hauptenia beibengensis Sui & Chen sp. nov.

Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 2 View Figures 1–4 , 5-13 View Figures 5–13

Type material.

Holotype, ♂, China: Xizang, Motuo, Beibeng (29.25°N, 95.18° E), 15 August 2020, Y-J Sui. Paratypes, 3♂, same data as holotype.

Measurements.

Body length (including fore wing): male 4.86-5.01 mm (n = 4); fore wing length: male 4.45-4.57 mm (n = 4).

Description.

Coloration. General color dark brown. Vertex (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 ), frons (Fig. 6 View Figures 5–13 ), gena (Figs 2 View Figures 1–4 , 7 View Figures 5–13 ), antennae, subantennal process, ocelli, pronotum and tegula (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 , 7 View Figures 5–13 ) yellowish brown. Rostrum brown, with apex fuscous. Eyes (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 2 View Figures 1–4 , 5-7 View Figures 5–13 ) slightly dark brown. Ocelli (Figs 2 View Figures 1–4 , 7 View Figures 5–13 ) slightly yellowish white. Mesonotum (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 ) dark brown, with median carina slightly lighter. Fore wing (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 2 View Figures 1–4 ) dark brown, veins same color. Hind wing subhyaline, brownish, veins lightly darker. Thorax with ventral areas yellowish brown. Legs brownish yellow. Genital segment dark brown.

Head and thorax. Head (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 ) including eyes distinctly narrower than pronotum (1: 1.49), short. Vertex (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 ) trapezoidal, length between basal angles wider than length in middle line (2.42: 1), slightly projecting in front of eyes, posterior margin slightly concave, lateral carinae slightly elevated, median carina absent, disk slightly depressed. Frons (Fig. 6 View Figures 5–13 ) longer in middle line than at the widest parts (1.54: 1), shorter than clypeus (1: 1.51), near apical 2/5 widest, disk depressed in entire length, lateral carinae keeled. Clypeus (Fig. 6 View Figures 5–13 ) distinctly carinate medially from near basal 1/3. Apical segment of rostrum longer than wide. Antennae (Figs 2 View Figures 1–4 , 6 View Figures 5–13 , 7 View Figures 5–13 ) short, second antennomere oval, flagellum originated from apical point. Subantennal processes (Figs 2 View Figures 1–4 , 7 View Figures 5–13 ) distinct, ear-shaped. Transversely oblique carina across the gena between subantennal process and lateral carina of frons distinct. Eyes (Figs 5-7 View Figures 5–13 ) semicircular. Lateral ocelli distinct, adjacent to eyes and antennae. Median length of pronotum distinctly less than that of vertex, anterior margin between eyes broadly convex, length behind eyes as long as median length. Mesonotum dorsally elevated, in lateral view raised above vertex, with median carinae reaching to the middle, posterior end triangularly depressed. Fore wing (Fig. 8 View Figures 5–13 ) narrow, ~ 3.1 × as long as the widest point, clavus closed, RA with two terminals, MP with four sectors. Hind wing (Fig. 9 View Figures 5–13 ) shorter than fore wing, with RP reaching to apical margin, CuA with three terminals. Hind tibia without lateral spine. Spinal formula of hind leg 7-6-5.

Male terminalia. Anal tube (Fig. 10 View Figures 5–13 ) moderately long, in dorsal view, lateral margin narrowed gradually toward the near middle and then parallel toward apex, width at base larger than the narrowest part ~ 1.9: 1, length in middle line (including epiproct) than widest part at base ~ 1.75: 1, dorsolateral margin convex medially near base; epiproct turned ventrad. Pygofer (Fig. 10 View Figures 5–13 ) in lateral view distinctly shorter dorsally than ventrally, dorsocaudal angle not produced. Gonostyli (Fig. 10 View Figures 5–13 ) symmetrical, short and stout, apical margin truncate, dorsocaudal angle not produced; each inner lower surface with small triangular process apically; inner side of laterodorsal margin with broad projection distad, in left lateral view, basal hook shorter and stout, apical hook slightly turned outward at end. Phallic complex (Figs 12 View Figures 5–13 , 13 View Figures 5–13 ) asymmetrical. Periandrium slightly curved, in left view, a big process arising from dorsal margin at base, and a short process arising from end with apex acute; in right view, a long and slender process arising from end near ventral margin. Endosoma more complex, with four lobes, one membrane and five processes of different sizes. Among four lobes, the longest lobe (L1) produced reaching to near base of periandrium, acute at apex; another other three lobes (L2-L4) round at apex, close together. In left lateral view, a small process (P1) arising from the longest lobe near apex, acute at apex; a long process (P2) arising from ventral margin of endosoma near at base, reaching to middle of periandrium; two long and sharped processes (P3, P4) arising from dorsal margin at base, pointed cephalad. In right lateral view, a small triangular process (P5) arising from the membrane one at base near dorsal margin.

Remarks.

This species is similar to H. fellea (Yang & Wu, 1994), but differs from the latter in the mesonotum (Figs 1 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–13 ) dark brown with median carinae reaching to the middle (mesonotum yellowish brown with median carinae reaching to near end in H. fellea ); gonostyli (Fig. 10 View Figures 5–13 ) with dorsocaudal angle not produced (gonostyli with dorsocaudal angle produced into finger-shaped process in H. fellea ); endosoma (Figs 12 View Figures 5–13 , 13 View Figures 5–13 ) with four lobes, one membrane and five processes of different sizes (endosoma with two lobes and four processes in H. fellea ).

Etymology.

This species is named after the collection site of the holotype, Beibeng Township in Xizang.

Host plants.

Unknown.

Distribution.

China (Xizang).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Derbidae

Genus

Hauptenia