Lasiochilus (Lasiochilus) hirtellus Drake & Harris, 1926
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3871.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:373BF217-8734-47A1-AF27-C16DFE48D1C9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5122525 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/894D87D0-860B-FFAF-FF1C-F8C5FCF5FECB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lasiochilus (Lasiochilus) hirtellus Drake & Harris, 1926 |
status |
|
Lasiochilus (Lasiochilus) hirtellus Drake & Harris, 1926
( Fig. 197 View FIGURES 195–199 )
Lasiochilus hirtellus Drake & Harris, 1926: 33 .
Diagnostic characters: Measurements, see Table VI. Male: Oblong oval. Dorsally with long, sparse setae. General coloration brown testaceous; head and pronotum shiny, hemelytra opaque; antennae testaceous to rufo-testaceous, eyes dark reddish; ocelli reddish, legs pale yellowish; male antennal segments (I:II:III:IV) 1: 2.8: 2.3: 2.1. Head longer than wide (considering postocular region). Pronotum smooth, strongly narrowing to apex; anterior lobe with a well-marked midfovea; short transverse sulcus in front of posterior lobe. Sixth abdominal segment with grouping of very short and thick copulatory teeth on apical left margin ( Fig. 215 View FIGURES 215–216 ). Genitalia: Pygophore ( Fig. 216 View FIGURES 215–216 ) with left paramere long, wide and angulated, acute apically. Female: antennal segments (I:II:III:IV) 1: 2.7: 2.3: 2.1. Similar to male in coloration.
Distribution: USA, Mexico, Cuba, Haiti, Panama, Colombia. ( Fig. 200 View FIGURE 200 ).
Material examined: Holotype USA: ♂ Ala., Thomasville, 11-VI-1919, H. H. Knight, Canal Fig., H. M. Harris coll. 1977, Lasiochilus hirtellus D. & H., n. sp. USNM; ♂ Calif., Curlew, 2-III-1945, 5-5-23905, in cocklebur, 45- 6240. USNM; 3 ♀ Florida, Gainesville, Doyle Conner, Bldg., 13-V-1975, F. W. Mead, Black light trap. USNM; 2 ♀ Same locality, 14-V-1975. USNM; 1 ♀, 7 ♂ Same locality, 16/ 18-V-1975. USNM; ♂ Same locality, 17-V-1975, (slide-mounted). MACN; 2 ♀ Same locality, 19-V-1975. USNM; 2 ♀, 2 ♂ Same locality, 30-V/ 1-VI-1975. USNM; ♂ Idem. MACN; CUBA: ♀ on Mustard greens, N. Y. City, 23-I-1942. USNM; HAITI: ♀ Miami 604, 29-IV-1948, -8783, Misc. Cuttings. USNM.
Discussion: Differs from L. pallidulus , the close related species, by its having a shorter, wider left paramere, that is not curved apically, and by the shorter interocular space.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Lasiochilinae |
Tribe |
Lasiochilini |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Lasiochilus |
Lasiochilus (Lasiochilus) hirtellus Drake & Harris, 1926
Carpintero, Diego Leonardo 2014 |
Lasiochilus hirtellus
Drake, C. J. & Harris, H. M. 1926: 33 |