Pella sultanica, Assing, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4507087 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/833EB459-677C-FFEF-FF43-FB84FC62FE62 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pella sultanica |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pella sultanica View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 8-13 View Figs 8-13 , Map 1 View Map 1 )
T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype ♀: "Petrowitz-Ressl, Reise nach Kleinasien 1960 / Umg. Akschehir, 4.5.1960 / Sultan-Dagh, im Detritus / Holotypus ♀ Pella sultanica sp. n. det. V. Assing 2007 " ( NHMW).
D e s c r i p t i o n: Measurements (in mm) and ratios (holotype): AL: 1.71; HL: 0.77; HW: 0.89; PW: 1.22; PL: 0.86; EL: 0.86; EW: 1.54; AW: 1.42; TiL: 0.95; TaL: 0.72; TL: 6.8; HW/HL: 1.16; PW/HW: 1.37; PW/PL: 1.42; EL/PL: 1.00; EW/PW: 1.26; AW/EW: 0.92; TiL/TaL: 1.31.
Coloration: head blackish brown; pronotum pale reddish; elytra brown, with the humeral angles, the suture, and the posterior margins yellowish; abdominal segments III-V light brown, with the middle part of the tergites darker; abdominal segments VI-VIII blackish, with paler posterior margins; legs and antennae reddish.
Habitus as in Fig. 8 View Figs 8-13 . Head transverse (see ratio HW/HL); puncturation distinct, interstices in median dorsal area on average slightly wider than diameter of punctures; microsculpture absent. Eyes large, somewhat longer than postocular region in dorsal view ( Fig. 9 View Figs 8-13 ). Antenna as in Fig. 10 View Figs 8-13 .
Pronotum strongly transverse (see ratio PW/PL) and distinctly wider than head (see ratio PW/HW; puncturation much finer and sparser than that of head; microsculpture absent ( Fig. 9 View Figs 8-13 ).
Elytra wider than and as long as pronotum (see ratios EW/PW and EL/PL); puncturation slightly denser and somewhat more distinct than that of pronotum, but finer and sparser than that of head; microsculpture absent ( Fig. 9 View Figs 8-13 ). Hind wings fully developed.
Abdomen subparallel, slightly narrower than elytra (see ratio AW/EW); puncturation moderately sparse and distinct; microsculpture absent ( Fig. 11 View Figs 8-13 ).
6: unknown. ♀: posterior margin of tergite VIII weakly convex and very finely (almost indistinctly) serrate; sternite VIII of similar length as tergite VIII, posterior margin weakly convex; spermatheca as in Figs 12-13. View Figs 8-13
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: The male sexual characters of this species are unknown, but based on the similarity of the external and the female sexual characters with those of P. cinctipennis and P. discolor , the new species appears to refer to the P. excepta group. From both P. cinctipennis and P. discolor , it is readily separated by much larger size, different coloration, the more transverse and relatively larger pronotum, the more massive antennae, the denser puncturation of the abdomen, the different puncturation of the forebody, as well as by the shape of the spermatheca.
E t y m o l o g y: The name (adjective) is derived from the Sultan Dağı, the name of the mountain where the holotype was discovered.
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d b i o n o m i c s: The type locality is situated in southwestern Anatolia ( Map 1 View Map 1 ). The holotype was apparently sifted from detritus.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |