Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3521.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9E2E5303-FBEA-44F7-92D4-05B2E608EB25 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5911752 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/833687D8-FC50-0C47-C494-FAC00413F5A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944 |
status |
|
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944 View in CoL
( Figs. 25 View FIGURES 19 – 27 , 51 View FIGURES 46 – 54 , 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 )
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum Théry, 1944: 22 View in CoL . Type locality: Argentina, Chaco de Santiago del Estero, Bords du Rio Salado, env. d´Icaño.
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum: Bellamy, 2008: 1520 View in CoL (catalogue).
Type specimens studied. Number of syntypes unknown; lectotype ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ), here designated (male, MFCB): “ Argentina, Rio Salado [h] // Tetragonoschema cupreomarginatum [sic!] Théry [h] paratype [p]” ; paralectotype, here designated (female, MNHN): “Museum Paris, [ Argentina] Chaco de Santiago del Estero, Bords du Rio Salado, env. d´Icaño, 1910, E. R. Wagner [p] // rubromarginatum Théry [h] Type [p]”.
Further specimens studied. ARGENTINA. CHUBUT: Desembocadura Río Chubut, 20.i.–7.ii.2011, D. Rojas Lanus leg. (3 males, MDCS) ; FORMOSA: La Rioja, Alparinche, 30.xii.2002, L. A. Stange leg. (1 male, FSCA) ; Mendoza, San Carlos Arroyo, El Yaucha, 1450 m, 21.i.1979, Sergio Roig leg., on Grindelia flowers (1 female, MDCS).
Diagnosis. Rather large, length: 5.2–6.5 mm, stout with bicolorous elytra: blue-black or blue-violet, completely margined with red or golden-red; frons with rather long, pronotum with very short, white pubescence; pronotum regularly convex without lateroposterior depressions, elytra flat with deep and wide discal depressions; elytral epipleura wide, reaching elytral suture, easily visible from above; aedeagus very short and stout, parameres with preapical spines ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 ). In its colouration resembling T. (T.) cupreocingulatum , T. (T.) humerale and T. (T.) trinidadanse but it differs from them strongly in the form of the elytral epipleura, pronotal shape and in the form of male genitalia.( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72 – 81 vs. Figs. 78, 80, 81 View FIGURES 72 – 81 ).
As the number of syntypes is unknown I hereby designate the male from MFCB as the lectotype and the female from MNHN as the paralectotype of T. rubromarginatum .
Bionomy. A female from Mendoza was collected on flower of Grindelia sp. ( Asteraceae ).
Sexual dimorphism. The female differs from the male only in the larger and stouter body.
Distribution. Argentina
Note. One male from Chubut possesses completely red elytra with a golden margin.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tetragonoschema (Tetragonoschema) rubromarginatum Théry, 1944
Bílý, Svatopluk 2012 |
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum:
Bellamy 2008: 1520 |
Tetragonoschema rubromarginatum Théry, 1944: 22
Thery 1944: 22 |