Lepidium

Al-Shehbaz, Ihsan A., 2021, The Afghan Cyphocardamum and Argentinean Lithodraba are united with Lepidium (Brassicaceae), Phytotaxa 516 (1), pp. 111-111 : 111

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.516.1.10

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/82792644-4F77-CD54-EAFC-17F7FC8B77CC

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lepidium
status

 

Lepidium View in CoL View at ENA L., Sp. Pl. 2: 643. 1753. Lectotype designated by Green (1925: 317): Lepidium latifolium L.

Britton & Brown (1913: 164) designated the same species a dozen years earlier, but their typification is to be rejected because it followed the American Code (see Turland et al., 2018: Article 10.6).

Cyphocardamum Hedge (1968: 122) View in CoL , syn. nov. Type:— C. aretioides Hedge (1968: 122) View in CoL .

Lithodraba Boelcke (1951: 349) View in CoL , syn. nov. Type:— Lithodraba mendocinensis ( Hauman 1918: 266) Boelcke (1951: 351) View in CoL .

Lepidium aretioides (Hedge) Al-Shehbaz , comb. nov. Basionym: Cyphocardamum aretioides Hedge (1968:122) View in CoL . Type:— AFGHANISTAN, Dashti-i-Nawar NW of Ghazni, 3000 m, 8–10 Jun 1965, F. Kasy 28 (holotype, W-1965-0020366!; isotype, E-00039815!).

Lepidium medocinense (Hauman) Al-Shehbaz , comb. nov. Basionym: Xerodraba mendocinensis Hauman (1918: 266) View in CoL . ≡ Lithodraba mendocinensis ( Hauman 1918: 266) Boelcke (1951: 351) View in CoL . Type: — ARGENTINA, Mendoza. Valle del Río Tunuyán superior, El Pedernal, 3500 m, 26 March 1918, R. Sanzín s.n. (holotype, BA-3836!). Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 .

Discussion: — Cyphocardamum and Lithodraba resemble Lepidium in having angustiseptate, dehiscent fruits with 1-seeded locules, and they are typically pulvinate, a feature rather rare in Lepidium . However, L. nanum Watson (1871: 30) and L. ostleri Welsh & Goodrich (1980: 80) are narrowly endemic pulvinate species in the western United States ( Al-Shehbaz and Gaskin, 2010). Both genera differ from Lepidium by the scapose habit with few-flowered racemes ( Cyphocardamum ) or solitary flowers ( Lithodraba ), and this “key” difference was used by Appel & Al-Shehbaz (2003) to separate them from Lepidium . However, both L. nanum and L. ostleri are scapose, and this single feature (scapose vs. non-scapose) alone does not justify the recognition of genera in the Brassicaceae . For example, Aphragmus Andrzejowski ex Candolle (1824: 209) has species with well-developed racemes and others with solitary flowers from a basal rosette. Furthermore, most species of Leavenworthia Torrey (1837: 87) produce solitary flowers and/or well-developed racemes on the same plant (see Rollins, 1963). Hedge (1968) considered Cyphocardamum to be closely related to Stroganowia Karelin & Kirilow (1841: 386) , but it is generally agreed that the latter genus is indistinguishable from Lepidium and was united with it nearly two decades ago ( Al-Shehbaz et al., 2002). Although some pulvinate plants in the family produce numerous flowers, none comes even close to those of L. mendocinense in which a single plant may have more than 4,000 flowers ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 ). In conclusion, the recognition of Cyphocardamum and Lithodraba as distinct from Lepidium is not supported by molecular data or by a single feature that consistently separates them from the last genus.

L

Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Brassicales

Family

Brassicaceae

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Brassicales

Family

Brassicaceae

Genus

Lepidium

Loc

Lepidium

Al-Shehbaz, Ihsan A. 2021
2021
Loc

Cyphocardamum

Hedge, I. 1968: )
Hedge, I. 1968: )
1968
Loc

Lithodraba

Boelcke, O. 1951: )
Hauman, L. 1918: 266
1951
Loc

Lepidium

Green, M. L. 1925: 317
1753: 643
1753
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF