Loxosceles, Heineken & Lowe, 1835
publication ID |
5FDF2E4A-1F35-4EC8-A1FE-DCE443E4E702 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5FDF2E4A-1F35-4EC8-A1FE-DCE443E4E702 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/817E87C3-FFDC-8909-FF1E-6150FA6DB94B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Loxosceles |
status |
|
Key to the Afrotropical species of the genus Loxosceles View in CoL View at ENA :
Males
1. Embolus with a flattened spiral towards apex ( Fig. 9L).............................................. L. spinulosa View in CoL
– Embolus with thin cylindrical shaft towards apex............................................................ 2
2. Cymbium lengthened, much longer than pulp bulb ( Fig. 9D, E, K)............................................... 3
– Cymbium short, not much longer than pulp bulb ( Fig. 9A, B, C)................................................ 5
3 Lengthened part of cymbium with an angular bend near palp bulb ( Fig. 9D).............................. L. meruensis View in CoL
– Lengthened part of cymbium with smooth curve near palp bulb ( Fig. 9E, K)....................................... 4
4. Palp tibia parallel sided ( Fig. 9E)............................................................... L. parramae View in CoL
– Palp tibia narrowing towards patella ( Fig. 9K).................................................. L. speluncarum View in CoL
5. Palp cymbium about half to less than half tibia length......................................................... 6
– Palp cymbium slightly longer than tibia length............................................................. 10
6. Palp tibia length/height ratio more than 2.5 ( Fig. 9M)............................................... L. vonwredei View in CoL
– Palp tibia length/height ratio less than 2.5 ( Fig. 9B, C, G, H).................................................... 7
7. Palp tibia length/height ratio less than 2.0 ( Fig. 9G)................................................. L. rufescens View in CoL
– Palp tibia length/height ratio more than 2.0 ( Fig. 9B, C, H)..................................................... 8
8. Palp bulb width about half tibia length ( Fig. 9C)................................................. L. foutadjalloni View in CoL
– Palp bulb width about a third tibia length ( Fig. 9B, H)........................................................ 9
9. Palp femur/cymbium ratio more than 4.5 ( Fig. 9H).................................................... L. rufipes View in CoL
– Palp femur/cymbium ratio less than 4.5 ( Fig. 9H).................................................... L. fontainei View in CoL
10. Palp femur shorter than patella + tibia length ( Fig. 9J).................................................. L. smithi View in CoL
– Palp femur length equal to than patella + tibia length ( Fig. 9A, F, I)............................................. 11
11. Cymbium twice as long as patella ( Fig. 9A)......................................................... L. bergeri View in CoL
– Cymbium length 1.5 times as long as patella ( Fig. 9F, I)...................................................... 12
12. Cymbium length 1.2 times as long as tibia ( Fig. 9F).................................................... L. pilosa View in CoL
– Cymbium length 1.5 times as long as tibia ( Fig. 9I)................................................. L. simillima View in CoL Females
1. Copulatory tubes connected or close together ( Fig. 10B, C, D, G, H)............................................. 2
– Copulatory tubes separated ( Fig. 10A, E, F, I, J, K, L)........................................................ 6
2. Copulatory tubes long and thin ( Fig. 10D).......................................................... L. neuvillei View in CoL
– Copulatory tubes broad chambers ( Fig. 10B, C, G, H)......................................................... 3
3. Spermathecae far apart ( Fig. 10H)................................................................. L. rufipes View in CoL
– Spermathecae close together ( Fig. 10B, C, G)............................................................... 4
4. Copulatory tubes without lateral sclerotized area ( Fig. 10C)............................................. L. lacroixi View in CoL
– Copulatory tubes with lateral sclerotized area ( Fig. 10B, G).................................................... 5
5. Two spermathecae to a side ( Fig. 10B)......................................................... L. foutadjalloni View in CoL
– One spermathecae to a side ( Fig. 10G)............................................................ L. rufescens View in CoL
6. Spermathecae situated in book-lung area ( Fig. 10E)................................................. L. parramae View in CoL
– Spermathecae situated between book-lung areas ( Fig. 10A, F, I, J, K, L).......................................... 7
7. One spermathecae on each side ( Fig. 10L)....................................................... L. vonwredei View in CoL
– Two spermathecae on each side ( Fig. 10A, F, I, J, K)......................................................... 8
8. Spermathecae large ( Fig. 10A, F)......................................................................... 9
– Spermathecae small ( Fig. 10I, J, K)...................................................................... 10
9. Spermathecae pairs far apart ( Fig. 10A)........................................................... L. bergeri View in CoL
– Spermathecae pairs close together ( Fig. 10F).......................................................... L. pilosa View in CoL
10. Posterior copulatory tube strait ( Fig. 10J)...................................................... L. speluncarum View in CoL
– Posterior copulatory tube curled ( Fig. 10I, K)............................................................. 11
11. Copulatory tube short before dividing ( Fig. 10I).................................................... L. simillima View in CoL
– Copulatory tube long before dividing ( Fig. 10K)................................................... L. spinulosa View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |