Rhinotocinclus pentakelis ( Roxo, Messias & Silva, 2019 ), 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-2022-0002 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A755C8D-B807-41CF-825B-BD3209119D54 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13891131 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F0187BB-E831-420A-FD90-FB325F90FE18 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhinotocinclus pentakelis ( Roxo, Messias & Silva, 2019 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Rhinotocinclus pentakelis ( Roxo, Messias & Silva, 2019) , new combination
( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ; Tab. 8 View TABLE 8 )
Parotocinclus pentakelis Roxo, Messias & Silva, 2019:347 (Type-locality: Brazil, Tocantins State, municipality Lavandeira, Rio Palmas, Rio Tocantins basin; 12°48’05”S 46°28’38”W. Holotype: MZUSP 124900).
Diagnosis. Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is distinguished from all congeners, except for R. bockmanni , R. dani , R. hera , R. marginalis n. sp., and R. loxochelis n. sp. by having the dominant color pattern formed by dark bars on body well separated and distinct (Fig. 7D; vs. dominant color pattern formed by wide dark bars partially coalesced or closed together, or formed by a dark stripe from the snout tip, through the eye and extending to end of caudal peduncle); having two separate light lines from snout tip diverging to each nostril (Figs. 6E,F; vs. light lines on snout absent, Y- or V-shaped); and by having teeth with yellow cusps (Fig. 5C; vs. cusps light ochre or brown). Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is further distinguished from R. britskii , R. discolor , R. eppleyi , R. isabelae , R. kwarup , R. longirostris , R. pilosus , R. polyochrus , R. variola , and R. yaka by lacking an adipose fin (vs. adipose fin present). Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is further distinguished from congeners, except R. bockmanni , R. dani , R. loxochelis n. sp., and R. marginalis n. sp., by having small platelets at adipose-fin position (vs. small platelets absent). Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is distinguished from R. bockmanni by lacking a triangular dark spot at the dorsal-fin membrane (vs. dorsal-fin dark spot present), and by having a conspicuous dark bar 2 on body (vs. bar 2 absent or inconspicuous). It is distinguished from R. hera by having small platelets at adipose-fin position (vs. small platelets absent) and yellow teeth cusps (vs. light ochre cusps); and from R. dani by the deeper body (body depth 18.4–20.8% vs. 16.3–18.3% SL; caudal peduncle depth 10.1–11.7% vs. 8.8–9.9% SL; head depth 43.6– 49.5% vs. 38.0–43.5% HL), and longer dorsal-fin spine (27.0–30.8% vs. 24.0–27.0% SL). Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is further distinguished from R. loxochelis n. sp. by the regularly arranged dark bars on body (vs. dark bars on body somewhat fragmented and inclined, such that they connect to form a zig-zag pattern), and the comparatively shorter head (head length 37.5–39.7% vs. 39.3–41.3% HL); and from R. marginalis n. sp. by the comparatively deeper caudal peduncle (10.1–11.7% vs. 9.1–10.1% SL and 26.3–29.7%; vs. 23.3–26.3% HL).
Geographical distribution. Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is only known from two localities in tributaries to the rio Tocantins in the state of Tocantins, Brazil ( Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 ).
Remarks. In the original description, Parotocinclus pentakelis was named and diagnosed from remaining Parotocinclus species, except P. dani , by possessing five conspicuous dark bars on body, compared to three or four dark bars of other Parotocinclus species. In fact, however, remaining Amazon basin Parotocinclus , now all transferred to Rhinotocinclus , possess five dark bars (Fig. 7). Extintion risk of Rhinotocinclus pentakelis is currently not assessed.
Material examined. MCP 54394, 36 (16 measured) + 2 cs, rio Palma at Lavandeira, rio Tocantins basin, Tocantins, Brazil, 12°47’41.03”S 46°30’46.20”W. GoogleMaps
R. pentakelis n = 16 | R. marginalis n = 13 | R. loxochelis n = 9 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character | ||||||||||||||
Low | High | Mean | SD | Hol | Low | High | Mean | SD | Hol | Low | High | Mean | SD | |
Standard length (mm) | 18.1 | 23.6 | 21.2 | 19.6 | 18.2 | 20.8 | 19.4 | 22.6 | 20.3 | 23.1 | 21.6 | |||
Percent of SL | ||||||||||||||
Body depth | 18.4 | 20.8 | 19.5 | 0.80 | 17.7 | 16.5 | 18.7 | 17.9 | 0.62 | 18.7 | 18.3 | 20.4 | 19.4 | 0.70 |
Predosal distance | 47.1 | 49.5 | 48.1 | 0.79 | 47.8 | 43.6 | 49.8 | 47.7 | 1.45 | 50.0 | 48.7 | 52.8 | 50.5 | 1.55 |
Prepelvic distance | 42.0 | 45.2 | 43.6 | 0.83 | 45.2 | 43.1 | 46.7 | 44.7 | 1.11 | 44.1 | 42.8 | 46.4 | 44.3 | 1.19 |
Preanal distance | 62.4 | 66.6 | 64.3 | 1.20 | 62.9 | 56.4 | 65.1 | 62.9 | 2.22 | 65.0 | 61.7 | 66.2 | 63.9 | 1.27 |
Preadipose distance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dorsal-fin spine length | 27.0 | 30.8 | 28.8 | 1.24 | 23.1 | 21.9 | 25.7 | 24.1 | 1.18 | 25.7 | 23.2 | 27.6 | 25.4 | 1.29 |
Anal-fin unbranched ray length | 18.4 | 21.8 | 19.7 | 0.90 | 18.0 | 17.0 | 19.9 | 18.6 | 0.77 | 17.3 | 17.1 | 19.0 | 18.0 | 0.73 |
Adipose-fin spine length | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Pectoral-fin spine length | 28.8 | 33.5 | 30.6 | 1.23 | 28.7 | 28.3 | 30.3 | 29.2 | 0.58 | 32.1 | 30.4 | 32.1 | 31.2 | 0.63 |
Caudal peduncle depth | 10.1 | 11.7 | 10.7 | 0.42 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 0.23 | 10.5 | 10.3 | 11.2 | 10.8 | 0.31 |
Dorsal-adipose fin distance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dorsal-fin base length | 11.1 | 13.1 | 12.5 | 0.46 | 12.1 | 11.4 | 12.4 | 12.0 | 0.27 | 11.9 | 11.8 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 0.66 |
Lower caudal-fin principal ray | 26.9 | 34.6 | 29.9 | 1.88 | 27.4 | 27.4 | 31.5 | 29.0 | 1.37 | 27.4 | 24.5 | 29.2 | 27.0 | 1.51 |
Cleithral width | 25.4 | 27.5 | 26.2 | 0.53 | 25.6 | 24.6 | 27.2 | 25.8 | 0.67 | 26.2 | 26.1 | 27.4 | 26.8 | 0.50 |
Head length | 37.5 | 39.7 | 38.3 | 0.61 | 39.2 | 38.0 | 40.8 | 39.3 | 0.97 | 39.3 | 39.3 | 42.1 | 40.4 | 0.79 |
Percent of HL | ||||||||||||||
Head depth | 43.6 | 49.5 | 47.1 | 1.70 | 45.2 | 40.2 | 46.1 | 44.0 | 1.83 | 49.4 | 44.3 | 49.4 | 46.8 | 1.75 |
Interorbital distance | 36.9 | 40.9 | 39.1 | 0.94 | 34.8 | 34.8 | 37.6 | 36.1 | 0.86 | 42.3 | 38.8 | 43.9 | 42.1 | 1.46 |
Orbital horizontal diameter | 15.9 | 18.2 | 16.7 | 0.62 | 16.7 | 14.9 | 17.5 | 16.2 | 0.72 | 17.5 | 15.9 | 18.1 | 17.3 | 0.63 |
Snout length | 49.2 | 53.3 | 51.0 | 1.05 | 51.4 | 47.9 | 53.1 | 50.7 | 1.27 | 50.0 | 49.4 | 52.3 | 51.0 | 0.98 |
Internarial distance | 7.6 | 12.3 | 9.7 | 1.55 | 12.4 | 8.2 | 13.2 | 11.1 | 1.30 | 14.4 | 11.8 | 14.4 | 13.0 | 0.80 |
Tooth count | ||||||||||||||
Premaxilla | 15 | 22 | 18.3 | 1.69 | 14 | 12 | 18 | 15.5 | 1.71 | 20 | 16 | 22 | 19.9 | 1.83 |
Dentary | 14 | 21 | 16.8 | 1.81 | 13 | 11 | 16 | 13.3 | 1.25 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 16.9 | 1.27 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhinotocinclus pentakelis ( Roxo, Messias & Silva, 2019 )
Reis, Roberto E. & Lehmann A., Pablo 2022 |
Parotocinclus pentakelis
Roxo, Messias & Silva 2019: 347 |