Rhinotocinclus acuen ( Silva, Roxo & Oliveira, 2014 ), 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-2022-0002 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A755C8D-B807-41CF-825B-BD3209119D54 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13891135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F0187BB-E826-4214-FD8E-FB145E44FEE8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhinotocinclus acuen ( Silva, Roxo & Oliveira, 2014 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Rhinotocinclus acuen ( Silva, Roxo & Oliveira, 2014) , new combination
( Fig. 44 View FIGURE 44 ; Tab. 9 View TABLE 9 )
Hisonotus acuen Silva, Roxo & Oliveira, 2014:107 (Type-locality: Brazil, Mato Grosso State, municipality of Querência, affluent of rio Toguro, rio Xingu basin, 13°00’26”S 52°11’27”W. Holotype: MZUSP 115350).
Diagnosis. Rhinotocinclus acuen is distinguished from congeners, except R. chromodontus , R. jumaorum , and R. dinizae , by having the dominant color pattern formed by a dark stripe from the snout tip, through the eye and extending to end of caudal peduncle (Fig. 7E; vs. dominant color pattern formed by dark bars separated and distinct, or dark bars wide and partially coalesced or closed together), and by having a V-shaped light mark from the snout tip to each nostril (Figs. 6C,D; vs. light mark absent, Y-shaped or present as two separate lines from snout tip diverging to each nostril). It is also distinguished from congeners, except R. chromodontus , R. dinizae , R. hera , and R. jumaorum , by lacking an adipose fin or platelets at the adipose-fin position (vs. adipose fin or platelets present). Rhinotocinclus acuen is distinguished from R. chromodontus by having oral teeth light ochre (Fig. 5B; vs. teeth reddish brown), caudal fin with a dark blotch at the base and two irregular dark bands (vs. caudal fin mostly brown, with two hyaline spot on upper and lower lobes), the dorsal- and pectoral-fin spines with 2–3 dark dots (vs. spines homogeneously dusky), narrower body (cleithral width 21.7– 24.1% vs. 24.9–27.9% SL and 57.6–62.7% vs. 67.7–76.2% HL), and fewer teeth (17–22 premaxillary, 14–19 dentary; vs. 26–40 and 21–34, respectively). It is distinguished from R. jumaorum by having teeth light ochre (vs. teeth brown), and by the relative proportion of caudal peduncle depth and body width (caudal peduncle depth 39.2–45.0% vs. 35.4– 39.0% cleithral width). Rhinotocinclus acuen is distinguished from R. dinizae by having shorter fins (dorsal-fin spine 20.0–22.8% vs. 22.8–25.5% SL, anal-fin unbranched ray 15.0–17.4% vs. 18.5–19.5% SL, and pectoral-fin spine 23.1–26.9% vs. 28.1–30.0% SL), and a shorter head (head length 37.0–40.0% vs. 40.0–41.8% SL).
Geographical distribution. Rhinotocinclus acuen occurs in the tributaries of the upper rio Xingu in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil ( Fig. 43 View FIGURE 43 ).
Remarks. Rhinotocinclus acuen was also described as a member of Hisonotus , and accordingly compared to other species of the later genus ( Silva et al., 2014). Interestingly, in the diagnosis of the new species the authors begin saying “ Hisonotus acuen differs from all congeners except H. bockmanni , H. chromodontus , H. insperatus , H. luteofrenatus , H. oliveirai , and H. paresi by having a functional V-shaped spinelet”. Both H. bockmanni and H. chromodontus are herein being tranferred to Rhinotocinclus and the remaining species have already been transferred to Curculionichthys , the functional V-shaped spinelet indeed diagnosing R. acuen and, in fact, all Rhinotocinclus and Curculionichthys species, from Hisonotus . Extintion risk of Rhinotocinclus acuen is currently not assessed.
Material examined. Rio Xingu basin, Mato Grosso State, Brazil: MZUSP 115350 , holotype (measured), creek tributary to rio Toguro , Querência, 13°00’26”S 52°11’27”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40543 , 22 (5 measured), AUM 73894, 10 , INPA 59665, 10 , ROM 111486, 10, córrego Trinta, tributary to rio Suaizinho on road BR-153 between Alô Brasil and Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°14’54”S 51°42’45”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32671, 2, creek tributary to rio Azul on road MT-140, Santa Carmen, 11°59’55”S 55°16’39”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32672, 5, rio Ferro on road from Novo Mato Grosso to Nova Ubiratã, ca. 25 km SW of Novo Mato Grosso, Nova Ubiratã, 13°03’32”S 55°02’12”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32673, 10 (3 measured) + 2 cs, creek tributary to rio da Saudade on road MT-423, ca. 38 km SE of Marcelândia, Analândia do Norte, 11°13’23”S 54°17’24”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32679, 2, córrego Tatu on road MT- 423, 14 km W of Cláudia, Cláudia, 11°28’36”S 54°58’47”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32680, 1, córrego Saudade on road from Santa Helena to Marcelândia, 66 km SE of road BR-163, Marcelândia, 11°07’07”S 54°40’15”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32681, 3, ribeirão Camparina on road MT-320 from Santa Helena to Marcelândia, 79 km SE of road BR-163, Marcelândia, 11°06’27”S 54°33’03”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32682, 9, rio Azul on road MT-140, ca. 7 km NNW of Santa Carmen, Santa Carmen, 11°54’42”S 55°17’48”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32683, 3, creek on road from Santa Terezinha to Iberê, ca. 10 km W of Iberê, Nova Ubiratã, 12°45’19”S 54°34’25”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32684, 7 + 1 cs, creek tributary to rio Tartaruga on road from Vera to Feliz, Vera, 12°15’55”S 55°15’37”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32685, 3, rio Azul on road MT- 423, 16 km w of Cláudia, Cláudia, 11°28’20”S 54°59’40”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32686, 6, rio Tartaruga on road MT-423 ca. 20 km E of Vera, Cláudia, 11°30’36”S 54°42’43”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32687, 16, creek on road from Novo Mato Grosso to Nova Ubiratã, 7 km SW of Novo Mato Grosso, Nova Ubiratã, 12°57’10”S 54°54’46”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32688, 3, rio Tartaruga at Nova Ubiratã, Nova Ubiratã, 13°02’03”S 55°16’07”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32689, 1, creek on road MT-320 from Santa Helena to Marcelândia, 73 km SE of road BR-163, Marcelândia, 11°07’39”S 54°36’52”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32690, 6, rio da Saudade on road MT- 423, 31 km SE of Marcelândia, Marcelândia, 11°11’11”S 54°19’27”W GoogleMaps . MCP 32691, 2, creek on road MT- 423, 22 km SE of Marcelândia, Marcelândia, 11°12’21”S 54°23’19”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32692, 4, creek tributary to rio Tartaruga on road from Novo Mato Grosso to Nova Ubiratã, ca. 44 km WSW of Novo Mato Grosso, Nova Ubiratã, 13°02’43”S 55°12’21”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32693, 2, rio Von der Steinen (or Atelchu) on road from Santa Terezinha to Iberê, ca. 28 km W of Iberê, Nova Ubiratã, 12°47’05”S 54°40’49”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32694, 6, creek tributary to rio Manissamá-Miçu on road MT-423 ca. 11.6 km SE of Marcelândia, Marcelândia, 11°09’46”S 54°27’01”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32695, 2, rio Tartaruga on road from Vera to Feliz Natal, 20 km NE of Vera, Vera, 12°14’21”S 55°07’11”W. GoogleMaps MCP 32696, 4, creek ca. 2 km N of Novo Mato Grosso, Nova Ubiratã, 12°53’49”S 54°50’54”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40283, 45 , MHNG 2787.080, 10, rio Traíras ca. 3 km W of Posto da Mata on road BR 242, Posto da Mata, 11°42’40”S 51°39’18”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40299, 12, córrego da Caaporã, tributary to córrego Três Marias, rio Suiazinho on road BR-158, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°32’10”S 51°46’45”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40365, 16 (2 measured), creek N of Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°35’50”S 51°46’55”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40402, 23, creek tribuatry to rio Suiazinho on road BR-158, ca. 1 km N of Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°29’21”S 51°46’06”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40720, 10, creek tributary to rio Suiazinho on road BR 158, ca. 1 km N of Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°29’21”S 51°46’06”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40732, 18, córrego Trinta, tributary to rio Suaizinho on road BR-153 between Alô Brasil and Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°14’54”S 51°42’45”W GoogleMaps . MCP 40790, 5, creek N of Ribeirão Cascalheira, Ribeirão Cascalheira, 12°35’50”S 51°46’55”W. GoogleMaps MCP 40814, 5, rio Traíras ca. 3 km W of Posto da Mata on road BR-242, Posto da Mata, 11°42’40”S 51°39’18”W. GoogleMaps
R. chromodontus n = 11 | R. acuen n = 11 | R. jumaorum n = 14 | R. dinizae n = 4 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Character | |||||||||||||||||||
Hol | Low | High | Mean | SD | Hol | Low | High | Mean | SD | Hol | Low | High | Mean | SD | Low | High | Mean | SD | |
Standard length (mm) | 26.2 | 23.3 | 32.2 | 26.9 | 25.8 | 22.3 | 27.4 | 25.2 | 26.3 | 24.4 | 31.0 | 27.0 | 17.8 | 20.0 | 19.0 | ||||
Percent of SL | |||||||||||||||||||
Body depth | 17.9 | 17.0 | 18.9 | 17.9 | 0.61 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 19.7 | 17.7 | 1.00 | 15.2 | 14.7 | 17.9 | 16.1 | 0.96 | 15.8 | 16.8 | 16.4 | 0.47 |
Predosal distance | 47.3 | 47.0 | 51.4 | 48.6 | 1.32 | 50.1 | 47.5 | 50.1 | 48.8 | 0.78 | 48.1 | 47.8 | 50.9 | 49.1 | 1.11 | 46.9 | 49.5 | 48.5 | 1.13 |
Prepelvic distance | 41.6 | 40.9 | 45.3 | 43.2 | 1.59 | 44.1 | 42.9 | 46.5 | 44.1 | 1.08 | 44.3 | 42.0 | 45.2 | 43.9 | 0.82 | 44.9 | 46.6 | 45.7 | 0.82 |
Preanal distance | 61.8 | 61.8 | 66.4 | 64.2 | 1.35 | 63.8 | 62.4 | 65.2 | 63.8 | 1.12 | 65.7 | 62.7 | 65.7 | 64.1 | 0.87 | 63.6 | 65.5 | 64.3 | 0.84 |
Preadipose distance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dorsal-fin spine length | 22.1 | 18.5 | 23.2 | 20.8 | 1.60 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 22.8 | 21.3 | 0.94 | 21.7 | 20.4 | 23.9 | 21.8 | 0.87 | 22.8 | 25.5 | 24.1 | 1.28 |
Anal-fin unbranched ray length | 16.0 | 13.5 | 17.0 | 15.1 | 0.97 | 15.4 | 15.0 | 17.4 | 16.3 | 0.83 | 16.5 | 15.3 | 18.2 | 16.8 | 0.67 | 18.5 | 19.5 | 19.0 | 0.44 |
Adipose-fin spine length | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Pectoral-fin spine length | 26.8 | 26.7 | 29.5 | 27.8 | 0.88 | 24.9 | 23.1 | 26.9 | 24.7 | 0.98 | 25.1 | 23.3 | 26.7 | 24.8 | 1.01 | 28.1 | 30.0 | 29.1 | 0.83 |
Caudal peduncle depth | 9.5 | 8.9 | 9.8 | 9.4 | 0.27 | 9.7 | 8.5 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 0.54 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 9.5 | 8.9 | 0.34 | 8.9 | 9.5 | 9.1 | 0.27 |
Dorsal-adipose fin distance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dorsal-fin base length | - | 10.6 | 14.2 | 12.4 | 1.03 | - | 11.6 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 0.59 | 10.8 | 9.6 | 11.1 | 10.4 | 0.39 | 11.0 | 12.8 | 12.0 | 0.88 |
Lower caudal-fin principal ray | 27.2 | 23.2 | 28.4 | 25.1 | 1.85 | - | 22.7 | 27.3 | 25.7 | 1.34 | - | 22.8 | 28.4 | 25.4 | 1.93 | 27.1 | 29.7 | 28.1 | 1.14 |
Cleithral width | 25.2 | 24.9 | 27.9 | 26.5 | 1.03 | 24.1 | 21.7 | 24.1 | 22.9 | 0.71 | 24.4 | 22.4 | 24.9 | 23.8 | 0.75 | 22.5 | 23.8 | 23.0 | 0.56 |
Head length | 36.3 | 36.2 | 38.5 | 37.1 | 0.74 | 40.0 | 37.0 | 40.0 | 38.6 | 0.89 | 36.8 | 36.4 | 39.7 | 37.8 | 1.18 | 40.0 | 41.8 | 41.0 | 0.75 |
Percent of HL | |||||||||||||||||||
Head depth | 45.4 | 40.8 | 50.1 | 46.8 | 2.88 | 45.1 | 41.2 | 45.1 | 42.8 | 1.27 | 41.3 | 38.5 | 43.6 | 41.2 | 1.70 | 37.8 | 42.4 | 39.7 | 2.11 |
Interorbital distance | 37.1 | 33.9 | 37.4 | 36.1 | 1.05 | 35.2 | 34.9 | 38.7 | 36.0 | 1.09 | 35.6 | 32.1 | 37.9 | 35.1 | 1.98 | 33.8 | 36.2 | 35.0 | 1.08 |
Orbital horizontal diameter | 13.1 | 11.5 | 13.7 | 12.8 | 0.63 | 14.0 | 13.0 | 15.5 | 13.9 | 0.73 | 14.0 | 12.8 | 15.0 | 13.9 | 0.67 | 12.9 | 14.8 | 13.8 | 0.78 |
Snout length | 55.4 | 53.4 | 57.4 | 55.2 | 1.23 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 56.1 | 55.0 | 1.16 | 57.7 | 55.5 | 59.8 | 57.4 | 1.12 | 52.9 | 54.3 | 53.7 | 0.62 |
Internarial distance | 8.8 | 6.2 | 13.1 | 8.8 | 2.19 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 0.54 | 11.6 | 9.9 | 13.7 | 11.5 | 0.96 | 7.3 | 11.3 | 10.1 | 1.88 |
Tooth count | |||||||||||||||||||
Premaxilla | 29 | 26.0 | 40.0 | 31.6 | 5.01 | 22 | 17 | 22 | 20.1 | 1.70 | 28 | 20.0 | 33.0 | 27.4 | 3.67 | 16.0 | 17.0 | 16.3 | 0.50 |
Dentary | 25 | 21.0 | 34.0 | 26.8 | 3.74 | 18 | 14 | 19 | 16.5 | 1.75 | 25 | 18.0 | 28.0 | 23.3 | 3.02 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 13.3 | 0.96 |
MZUSP |
MZUSP |
MCP |
MCP |
AUM |
AUM |
INPA |
Brazil, Amazonas, Manaus, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazoonia, Colecao Sistematica da Entomologia |
ROM |
Canada Entomology Department, Royal Ontario Museum |
MHNG |
Switzerland, Geneva, Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
MCP |
Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul |
AUM |
Auburn University Museum of Natural History |
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
ROM |
Royal Ontario Museum |
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
BR |
Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collection |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhinotocinclus acuen ( Silva, Roxo & Oliveira, 2014 )
Reis, Roberto E. & Lehmann A., Pablo 2022 |
Hisonotus acuen
Silva, Roxo & Oliveira 2014: 107 |