Trichadenotecnum quaesitum, (CHAPMAN)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00398.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5492554 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E7087BE-FFAA-BB24-FCCB-FD9E681EF98C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trichadenotecnum quaesitum |
status |
|
TRICHADENOTECNUM QUAESITUM (CHAPMAN) View in CoL
Psocus quaesitus Chapman, 1930: 270 View in CoL (male; not female of Psocus quaesitum Chapman, 1930: 270 ).
Trichadenotecnum slossonae (Banks) View in CoL : Sommerman, 1948: 273 (female).
Trichadenotecnum quaesitum (Chapman) View in CoL : Mockford, 1993: 286.
Material examined: CANADA: 1 male, Quebec, Rd. 18 nr Mascouche, N. Montreal, 21.viii.1956, ELM ( ISU) ; 1 male, USA: Indiana, Dunes State Park , 6.ix.1952, ELM ( ISU) ; 1 male, Missouri, Big Spring State Park , Carter Co., 21.vi.1959, ELM ( ISU) ; 1 male, 1 female, South Carolina, Berkeley Co., Bonneau, 3.x.1973, ELM ( ISU) .
Diagnosis: Although considerable variations in body size and some genital characters are recognized, this species can be characterized by the combination of the following character states: forewing not extensively covered with small spots ( Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ); basal lobe of clunial arm weakly sclerotized ( Fig. 21A View Figure 21 ); epiproct lobe nearly parallel sided ( Fig. 21B View Figure 21 ); apex of hypandrial right arm exceeding outer margin of left process; hypandrial median tongue relatively broad, asymmetrical, slightly left skewed ( Fig. 21C View Figure 21 ); pseudoparameres widely separated, aedeagal area wider than basal width of pseudoparamere ( Fig. 21D View Figure 21 ). In contrast, the following intraspecific variations were observed: difference in body size, male forewing length 2.6–3.8 mm; some minute differences in hypandrium and phallosome. However, these variations are continuous and intraspecific. It is also possible that these morphological variations indicate genetic isolation between different populations, and further morphological and molecular analyses are required to clarify it. See Mockford (1993) for further description of the species.
ISU |
Indiana State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Trichadenotecnum quaesitum
Yoshizawa, Kazunori, Aldrete, Alfonso Neri García & Mockford, Edward L. 2008 |
Trichadenotecnum quaesitum (Chapman)
Mockford EL 1993: 286 |
Trichadenotecnum slossonae (Banks)
Sommerman KM 1948: 273 |
Psocus quaesitus
Chapman PJ 1930: 270 |
Chapman PJ 1930: 270 |