Trichadenotecnum quaesitellum, Yoshizawa & Aldrete & Mockford, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00398.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10546173 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7E7087BE-FFAA-BB1A-FCF8-F9616854FA26 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trichadenotecnum quaesitellum |
status |
sp. nov. |
TRICHADENOTECNUM QUAESITELLUM View in CoL SP. NOV.
Material examined: Holotype. Male. Mexico: Tamaulipas, 5.1 mi W Gómez Farías , 16.vi.1962, ELM et al. ( ISU).
Etymology: The specific epithet is taken from quaesitum (= specific epithet of Trichadenotecnum quaesitum ) + - ellus (= Latin diminutive). This species is very similar to T. quaesitum but smaller.
Description: Male. Head. White in ground colour; vertical and orbital markings blackish brown; coronal suture black; frontal suture bordered with narrow brown band dorsally; frons with pair of pale brown bands at middle and with pair of circular markings laterally; eye black, IO/D = 0.6; ocelli white, ocellar field black; gena white; antennal socket bordered with brown band; postclypeus with c. eight rows of pale brown spots at middle, fused with each other ventrally forming a large marking, ventro-lateral corner white, lateral margin of postclypeus dark brown, Key to species of the quaesitum group
1. Forewing extensively covered with small spots ( Fig. 17F–I View Figure 17 ).......................................................................3
– Forewing not extensively covered with small spots ( Fig. 17C, D View Figure 17 )................................................................2
2. Hypandrial median tongue relatively short, about 3¥ longer than apical width; hypandrial right process exceeding left one ( Fig. 21C View Figure 21 )............................................................................................. T. quaesitum (Chapman) View in CoL
– Hypandrial median tongue relatively long, about 3.5¥ longer than apical width; hypandrial right arm not exceeding left one ( Fig. 22C View Figure 22 ); female unknown................................................................... T. quaesitellum View in CoL sp. nov.
3. Hypandrial left process long, exceeding apex of right one ( Fig. 23C View Figure 23 ). .......................................................... 4
– Hypandrial left process short, not reaching right one ( Fig. 31C View Figure 31 ); female unknown ...... T. brevicornum View in CoL sp. nov.
4. Forewing sparsely spotted, areola postica not covered with large brown marking ( Fig. 17E View Figure 17 ) ........................... 5
– Forewing densely spotted; distal half of areola postica covered with large brown marking ( Fig. 17F View Figure 17 )......................................................................................................... T. maculatum View in CoL sp. nov.
5. Clunial lobe membranous ( Fig. 23A View Figure 23 ); subgenital plate without narrow membranous notch antero-medially ( Fig. 24A View Figure 24 ).........................................................................................................................................6
– Clunial lobe strongly sclerotized ( Fig. 29A View Figure 29 ); body of subgenital plate with narrow membranous notch anteromedially extending near base of egg guide ( Fig. 30A View Figure 30 ).................................................... T. ericium View in CoL sp. nov.
6. Forewing proximal band complete in cell CuA ( Fig. 17E View Figure 17 ); hypandrial median tongue broad, about 2¥ longer than apical width ( Fig. 23C View Figure 23 ); dorsal margin of epiproct lobe with conical median projection ( Fig. 23B View Figure 23 ) ...................... ....................................................................................................................... T. cerrosillae View in CoL sp. nov.
– Forewing proximal band narrowly interrupted at median part of cell CuA ( Fig. 17G View Figure 17 ); hypandrial median tongue slender, about 2.5¥ longer than apical width ( Fig. 27C View Figure 27 ); dorsal margin of epiproct lobe without distinct median projection ( Fig. 27B View Figure 27 ).......................................................................................... T. neoleonense View in CoL sp. nov.
dorsal margin without marking; anteclypeus pale brown. Antenna pale brown, pedicel and scape darker. Mouth parts pale brown; 4th segment of maxillary palpus brown.
Thorax. Prothorax brown. Mesonotum pale; anterior surface of scutum brown; lateral lobe of scutum with large pale brown marking; scutellum pale brown, median part darker, anterior margin blackish brown; postnotum brown. Metanotum pale brown, with three whitish oval spots on posterior regions of scutal lobes. Meso- and metapleurites brown, with longitudinal white band medially.
Legs. Pale brown; middle and hind coxae, basal half of middle femur and entire hind femur brown, distal tip of hind tibia darker.
Forewing ( Fig. 17D View Figure 17 ). Not extensively covered with tiny spots. Spots in cell a 1 apparent, nearly of equal size. Opposing spots in cell r distinct. Proximal band broad, narrowly interrupted just beyond fork of M + Cu. Distal band distinct. Spot on roof of cell m 3 narrow but distinct. Submarginal spots apparent; spot in cell r 5 elongate. Marginal clouds distinct. Hindwing. Hyaline, cell CuP with faint brownish spots in distal half; veins brown.
Abdomen. White, with sparse minute blackish brown spots. Terminalia. Clunial arm ( Fig. 22A View Figure 22 ) developed but very weakly sclerotized, not forming free process apically, basally with membranous lobe ventrally covered with short spines. Anterior margin of 8th sternum ( Fig. 22C View Figure 22 ) smoothly arched, fusion with hypandrium narrow. Epiproct lobe ( Fig. 22B View Figure 22 ) broadened dorsally, wider than long, dorsal margin sinuate, posterior surface slightly concave. Paraproct ( Fig. 22A View Figure 22 ); ventro-lateral band short, triangular; distal process long. Hypandrium ( Fig. 22C View Figure 22 ): outer margin of left process slightly arched, directed posteriorly; right process projected outward, then strongly bent postero-internally near base, its apex not exceeding outer margin of left process; median tongue long, slightly constricted medially, apical margin slightly hollowed, dorsal keel rounded. Phallosome ( Fig. 22D View Figure 22 ): pseudoparameres widely separated, long, longer than basal width, directed dorsally, apical margin rounded with tiny denticles internally. Phallobase widest at anterior third, then narrowing to pointed anterior end.
Length. B 2.3; FW 2.8; HW 2.0.
Female. Unknown.
Distribution: Mexico.
ISU |
Indiana State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.