Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis, Boumendjel & Rabet & Amarouayache, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4526.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:247DD25E-E415-4AD7-BB23-897E975CD6BB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5989235 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/785287BE-9E42-3E3A-77DB-544CFB88F83A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 )
Etymology. The specific epithet “ sanhadjaensis ” refers to the Guerbes-Sanhadja wetlands complex of international importance (Ramsar 2001) where the Ain-Magroun and Belkroun pools are situated.
Type locality. Ain-Magroun, a temporary freshwater pond (coordinates: 36°50'20.99" N, 7°17'01.17" E, altitude 19 m a.s.l) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). The pond is located in a meadow in the municipality of Ben Azzouz (Skikda Province, Northeastern Algeria) and is part of the Guerbes-Sanhadja wetlands complex. The pool has an oval shape and an area of about 1000 m 2, with a maximum depth of 0.5 m ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), and with some humid depressions in its periphery. It generally inundates in January or February and dries out in April. During our sampling in January 2015 the pH was of 7.13, water conductivity 154 µS/cm and temperature 9.4°C.
Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis appears to be restricted to the type locality and two small temporary pools in Belkroun (Ben Azzouz, Province of Skikda) located about 10 km east of Ain-Magroun pond (36°51'59.13"N, 7°23'37.35"E, altitude 6 m a.s.l.). These pools are artificial water holes for livestock watering with an area of about 16 m 2 and a maximum depth of about 2.5 m. During our sampling in December 2017, pH was of 7.15, conductivity of 262 µS/cm and water temperature of 10.9°C ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). The distribution of this species seems to be limited to the Guerbes-Sanhadja wetland complex, where agricultural activities are important.
Type material. Holotype. Mature male of 17.8 mm total length; Algeria: Skikda Province: Ain-Magroun temporary pond; 11 January 2015; S. Ghaouaci leg; stored in 96% ethanol after formalin fixation (MNHN-IU- 2017-2317).
Allotype. Mature female of 16.8 mm total length: same data as the holotype (MNHN-IU- 2017-2318) . Paratypes: Two males of 16 and 17.6 mm total length (MNHN-IU- 2017-2319); same data as holotype. Two females of 12 and 12.8 mm total length (MNHN-IU- 2017-2320); Algeria: Skikda Province: Belkroun; 20 December 2017; M. Amarouayache leg ; stored in ethanol 96% after formalin fixation. Description. Male. Living specimens have a transparent to greenish colour with a vermillion furcae.
First antennae filiform, with apical setae, with a length 0.7x of the second antenna proximal antennomere.
Second antennae ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ) proximal antennomere curved medially, bearing an apophysis total length ~1.1x distal antennomere. Apophysis subconic, digitiform; apex with denticles; total length ~0.25x of the proximal antennomere. Second antennae distal antennomere with a proximal, medially directed, ~30° bend, apically truncated, and bearing a proximedial projection and a spiniform projection, just distal to the proximedial projection ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3 ). Proximedial projection lobiform, distal surface bearing scattered denticles or apically truncated spinulae; total length ~0.2x article length. Antennal appendage ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ) total length 0.6x second antenna. Basal lamella (ventral lamella) triangular, apex elongate, with a small dorsal carina. Basal lamella margins bearing small, evenly distributed papillae, with the medial margin provided with three rows of papillae. Lateral margin papillae each with an apical denticle ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). Antennal appendage dorsal lamella length 1.7x basal lamella, serrate in the distal half with medial and lateral margins bearing subtriangular papillae (larger medially) diminishing in size distally; apex acute. Medial papillae with posterior margin edged in short setae.
Labrum. Distal lobe rounded, 0.5 x of length exceeding the distal margin of the labrum.
Mandibles asymmetrical, right mandible molar surface with two posterio-apical acute spines, equal in length; molar surface of left mandible bearing a row of eight robust teeth on the lateral outer margin.
Maxilla I. Typical for the genus ( Cottarelli et al. 2010; 2017). Setae aciculate and straight; there is also a posterior ventral acute spine.
Maxilla II rounded lobe bearing two robust plumose apical setae, approximately equal.
Phyllopodia with gross structure typical for genus. Thoracopod I ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ), with the first three endites (I to III) arcuate, rounded. Endite I and II fused, four to five times as broad as long. Endite III two times as broad as long, with two plumose acute spines 0.5 x broad of the endite. Endites I to III margined with long plumose setae, four to five times the endite length, decreasing in length medially. Endites IV to VI rounded as broad as long ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Endite IV with six plumose acute spines, each two times the endite length. Endite V and VI with four plumose acute spines, each two times the endite length.
Thoracopod VI ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ), with endite I and II fused, arcuate, rounded, five times as broad as long. Endite III, arcuate, rounded, two times as broad as long. Endites I to III margined with long plumose setae, five to six times the endite length, decreasing in length medially. Endite IV and V lamellar, with two plumose acute spines each twice the endite length. Endite VI lamellar, with three plumose acute spines, each two times the endite length.
Thoracopods I to X with endopod ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ) broad, forming right angle to limb, bearing short, plumose acute marginal spines. Exopod oval, margined with a few small plumose spines and a long plumose setae apically. Epipodite subcylindrical, length 4x width. Praepipodite completely divided in two, broadly rounded distally, with margin serrate and inerm.
Thoracopod XI ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ), with endite I and II fused, arcuate, rounded, six times as broad as long. Endite III, arcuate, rounded, two times as broad as long. Endites I to III margined with plumose setae, two to three times the endite length, decreasing in length medially. Endites IV to VI rounded as broad as long. Endite IV and V with 3 plumose acute spines each two times the endite length. Endite VI with four plumose acute spines, each two times the endite length.
Thoracopod XI without praepipodite (branchial lamina) and with a conical epipodite three times longer than its width, with acute apex and without spine or setae.
Gonopod ( Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ) typical for the genus, with a lateral conical lobe. Gonopod rigid basal portion subtriangular, medially margined in dense setae. Eversible portion of the gonopods ( Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ) represented by conical and curved apex bearing one tiny tubercle.
Abdominal-somites smooth, without projections.
Cercopods length does not exceed the length of last three abdominal segments; cercopods bordered with long plumose setae.
Female. transparent to greenish colour with vermillion furcae.
Second antennae slightly shorter by 20 % than the first pair of antennae, flattened, subconical apex acute.
Thoracopods I-XI ( Fig. 4G, H, I View FIGURE 4 ) as in the male.
Genital somites. First genital somite reaches half the length of the second one ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ).
Brood pouch conical, extending to the third or fourth abdominal somite with gonopore typical for genus.
Abdominal somites and cercopods ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) similar to those of males.
Eggs. ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) shell with high and thin palisaded structure delimiting more or less regular polygons. Diameter of eggs: (448.24 ± 30.93 µm, n =90).
Size. Male average length 17.4 ± 1.66 mm (14-21.3 mm, N = 19). Female average length of 17.9 ± 2 mm (14- 19.7 mm, N = 6),
Differential diagnosis. Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis . sp. nov. is most similar to C. marchesonii and C. tauricus . These species are separated from all other Chirocephalus by the shape of the male antennal appendage and by large eggs. Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis . sp. nov. is separated from C. marchesonni and C. tauricus by the second antenna distal antennomere having a distinct basomedial projection and proximal spiniform projections present only in this species.
In C. sanhadjaensis View in CoL . sp. nov., the male second antennal distal antennomere is slightly curved in its proximal portion, and almost straight for the apical length as in C. marchesonii Ruffo & Vesentini, 1957 View in CoL , C. neumanni Hartland-Rowe, 1967 View in CoL and C. algidus Cottarelli et al. 2010 View in CoL but not in C. diaphanus Prévost, 1803 View in CoL or C. salinus Daday, 1910 View in CoL , where the distal portion is more curved, or in C. tauricus Pesta, 1921 View in CoL where the distal antennomere widens apically and is somewhat spatulate.
In C. sanhadjaensis View in CoL sp. nov. the basal process of the distal antennomere of the antennae is well developed, rather straight with denticles and a slightly curved apex, while this basal process of the distal antennomere is short and slightly pointed, devoid of teeth in C. marchesonii View in CoL . Chirocephalus algidus View in CoL has a quite elongated and narrow, straight and dentate basal process, and in C. tauricus View in CoL the basal process is small and pointed, with a curved apex directed backwards ( Cottarelli et al. 2010).
The long basolateral digitiform expansions of the dorsal lamella are present in many species of the genus Chirocephalus , e.g. C. diaphanus , C. salinus , also in representatives of other species-groups of the genus Chirocephalus , e.g. C. sarpedonis Cottarelli et al. 2017 , C. croaticus Steuer, 1899 , C. kerkyrensis Pesta, 1936 ; but they are absent in C. sanhadjaensis sp. nov. as in C. appendicularis Vàvra, 1905 , C. marchesonii , C. tauricus , C. skorikowi Daday, 1913 , C. weisigi Smirnov, 1933 , C. neumanni , C. ponticus Beladjal & Mertens, 1997 and C. algidus Cottarelli et al. 2010 . The dorsal lamella of C. sanhadjaensis sp. nov. and C. marchesonii is 1.5x long than the basal lamella. In C. tauricus and C. weisigi the dorsal lamella is short, half the length of the basal lamella, while in C. algidus the dorsal lamella, is somewhat longer than the basal lamella ( Cottarelli et al. 2010). Basal lamella of C. sanhadjaensis sp. nov exhibits a small carina, present also in C. marchesonii , C. algidus and several other taxa of the “ diaphanus ” group, where the size of carina differs between species. However, it is absent in C. tauricus and C. salinus . The outline of the basal lamella of C. sanhadjaensis resembles that of C. tauricus and C. marchesonii , with margins bearing small, evenly distributed papillae, with the medial margin bearing several papillae.
The brood pouch of C. sanhadjaensis sp. nov. is conical, reaching the 3 th or 4 th abdominal segment and is similar in shape to that of C. diaphanus , C. salinus and several other species of the “ diaphanus ” group. The brood pouch of C. algidus is thick and very short (does not reach the length of the two subsequent somites), while in C. tauricus and C. marchesonii the brood pouch is somewhat longer than C. algidus although different in shape, swollen in C. tauricus ( Cottarelli et al. 2010) .
In C. sanhadjaensis View in CoL sp. nov. the egg ornamentations are similar to those of C. diaphanus View in CoL and many other species in the genus. However, the egg diameter is particularly large (448.24 µm). Indeed, C. marchesonii View in CoL is the second species in the group that produces eggs with a diameters exceeding 430 µm, but its eggs are easily distinguishable by their smooth and fibrous surface ( Mura et al. 1978; Mura, 2001).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Anostracina |
Family |
|
Genus |
Chirocephalus sanhadjaensis
Boumendjel, Lylia, Rabet, Nicolas & Amarouayache, Mounia 2018 |
C. sanhadjaensis
Boumendjel & Rabet & Amarouayache 2018 |
C. sanhadjaensis
Boumendjel & Rabet & Amarouayache 2018 |
C. sanhadjaensis
Boumendjel & Rabet & Amarouayache 2018 |
C. algidus
Cottarelli 2010 |
C. neumanni
Hartland-Rowe 1967 |
C. marchesonii
Ruffo & Vesentini 1957 |
C. marchesonii
Ruffo & Vesentini 1957 |
C. marchesonii
Ruffo & Vesentini 1957 |
C. tauricus
Pesta 1921 |
C. tauricus
Pesta 1921 |
C. salinus
Daday 1910 |
C. diaphanus Prévost, 1803
Prevost 1803 |
C. diaphanus
Prevost 1803 |